Cited by

She argues the trial court abused its discretion by permitting the State to strike the only Black juror 1 We view the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” -89, -64 (1997) (citation omitted).

¶4 We have jurisdiction over Gonzalez’s appeal pursuant to Article 6, Section 9, of the Arizona Constitution, and Arizona Revised Statutes sections 12-120.21(A)(1), 13-4031, and -4033(A)(1).2 1 We view the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” -89, -64 (1997).

1This court views the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve[s] all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” -89 (1997).

He appealed, and we have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to Article 6, Section 9, of the Arizona 1We view the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” -89, -64 (1997) (citation omitted).

She opted for trial and the jury found her guilty as 1We view the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” -89, -64 (1997).

1 We view the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” -89, -64 (1997).

He testified that he lived with his parents, a younger brother, and a 23-year-old cousin; that he got 1 We view the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” -89, -64 (1997).

Stevens was subsequently sentenced to concurrent prison terms not 1We view the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” -89, -64 (1997) (citation omitted).

During the December 2014 sentencing hearing, the court held a 1We view the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” -89, -64 (1997).

Officers asked if Wynn had had anything to drink, and Wynn told them she had consumed two “Long Island iced teas.” The officers conducted field 1This court views the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve[s] all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” -89 (1997) (citation omitted).

1We view the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” -89, -64 (1997).

Fearing 1We view the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” -89, -64 (1997).

ister as a sex offender and, as a result of that conviction, the court found that Gorman violated his lifetime probation in Maricopa County Superior Court No. CR 2005- 113240.2 After the court heard from the parties, Gorman was sentenced to 1 We view the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” -89, -64 (1997).

After that evidentiary hearing, the superior court found the pre- 1 This court views the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve[s] all reasonable inference against the defendant.” –89, –64 (1997) (citation omitted).

1We view the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” -89, -64 (1997).

1We view the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” -89, -64 (1997).

On the State’s motion, the court held an Arizona Rule of Evidence 609 hearing and 1This court views the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve[s] all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” –89, –64 (1997) (citation omitted).

1This court views the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve[s] all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” –89, –64 (1997) (citation omitted).

1We view the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” -89, -64 (1997).

1This court views the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve[s] all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” -89, -64 (1997) (citation omitted).

Because of his mental health diagnosis, Clitso’s lawyer asked for a competency 1We view the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” -89, -64 (1997).

1We view the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” -89, -64 (1997).

delay your sentencing, you could potentially be losing the right to file an appeal.” When asked if Ruiz understood that warning, Ruiz responded “[y]es, sir.” Ruiz had similarly affirmed his understanding of this right at prior 1This court views the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve[s] all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” –89, –64 (1997) (citation omitted).

During the trial, the jury heard from the police officers and the participants, including Riley, who testified on his own 1We view the facts “in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and resolve all reasonable inferences against the defendant.” -89, -64 (1997).