Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Riggs, 942 P.2d 1159.

105 citing documents.

State v. Thomas 996 P.2d 113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
“[I]f a statute’s language is clear and unambiguous, we must give effect to that language and need not employ other rules of statutory construction.”
Taeger v. CATHOLIC FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVS. 995 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Taeger v. CATHOLIC FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVS. 995 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
The Taegers’ -76 , -17 (App.1996), vacated on other grounds, , , in support of this argument is misplaced.
State v. Malvern 962 P.2d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
State v. Malvern 962 P.2d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
“[I]f a statute’s language is clear and unambiguous, we must give effect to that language and need not employ other rules of statutory construction.”