Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Terrazas, 944 P.2d 1194.

132 citing documents.

State v. Whiteside Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Whiteside Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Zweifelhofer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Zweifelhofer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Faria Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Faria Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
404(c)(1)(A); (standard for prior bad acts is clear and convincing evidence).
State v. Borquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Borquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
10 STATE v. BORQUEZ Decision of the Court uncharged wrongful conduct “can easily tip the balance against the defendant,” ¶ 15 (2011) (cleaned up), evidence of “prior bad acts” is “usually inadmissible at trial,”
State of Arizona v. Timothy Andrew Parkinson 554 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State of Arizona v. Timothy Andrew Parkinson 554 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
-84 (1997) (departing from federal standard, reasoning that clear and convincing standard protects defendant from “high probability of prejudice”) with 7 STATE v. PARKINSON Opinion of the Court supreme court’s 2020 am
State v. Quijada Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Quijada Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Rix 536 P.3d 253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Rix 536 P.3d 253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
(observing other-act evidence could influence a jury’s decision despite a cautionary instruction).
State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca Allen 513 P.3d 282 Ariz. 2022
State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca Allen 513 P.3d 282 Ariz. 2022
¶57 To admit other act evidence, a trial court must first find “that there is clear and convincing proof both as to the commission of the other bad act and that the defendant committed the act.” ¶ 33 (2008) ().
State v. Wade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Wade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Worrell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Worrell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶14 We further conclude the record contains clear and convincing evidence the fractures to C.W.’s metatarsal and tibia bones “were committed and that the defendant committed [them].” ¶ 35 (App. 1998) (permitting appellate court, on review, to determine whether clear and convincing evidence supported admission of other-act evidence).
State v. Vargas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Vargas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
In addition, “the profferer must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the prior bad acts were committed and that the defendant committed the acts.” (emphasis omitted).
State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
(holding that the State must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the other act occurred and the defendant committed the act).
State v. Sutherland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Sutherland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Carrillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Carrillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Generally, other-act evidence is admissible if: (1) the evidence is admitted for a proper purpose; (2) the evidence is relevant; (3) the evidence is not unfairly prejudicial under Rule 403; and (4) the judge gives “an appropriate limiting instruction, if the party requests one.” (citation omitted).
State v. Hardy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Hardy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
“When the State seeks to admit evidence of other acts of the defendant, it must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant committed the other acts” and the acts “must be offered for a proper purpose.” ¶ 69 (2012) ().
State v. Riley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Riley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Castro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Castro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Britton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Britton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Cleveland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Cleveland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Winiker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Galvez-Galvez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Winiker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Galvez-Galvez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Rule 404(c)(1)(A); ¶ 77 (2017)
State v. Schaeffer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Schaeffer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Vaughn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Vaughn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018