Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Greene, 967 P.2d 106.

223 citing documents.

State v. Finch 46 P.3d 421 Ariz. 2002
¶39 ¶ 58, ¶ 58 (1998), the defendant’s ex-wife’s testimony expressed concern about the effect the defendant’s execution would have on their children.
State v. Blackman 38 P.3d 1192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
State v. Blackman 38 P.3d 1192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
State v. Thompson 34 P.3d 382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
State v. Sansing 26 P.3d 1118 Ariz. 2001
State v. Sansing 26 P.3d 1118 Ariz. 2001
¶ 13 The State, relying on LaGrand and Greene, argues that the defendant’s overall motive was to rob the victim and “this desire infect[ed] all other conduct of the defendant.” , , 439 ¶ 32, , 114 ¶ 32 (1998), cert.
State v. Ring 25 P.3d 1139 Ariz. 2001
State v. Ring 25 P.3d 1139 Ariz. 2001
440 ¶ 39, , 115 ¶39 (1998).
State v. Hoskins 14 P.3d 997 Ariz. 2000
State v. Jones 4 P.3d 345 Ariz. 2000
State v. Jones 4 P.3d 345 Ariz. 2000
444 n. 2, , 119 n. 2 (1998); Ariz. R.Crim.
State v. Kayer 984 P.2d 31 Ariz. 1999
State v. Kayer 984 P.2d 31 Ariz. 1999
State v. Van Adams 984 P.2d 16 Ariz. 1999
State v. Van Adams 984 P.2d 16 Ariz. 1999
444 n. 2, , 119 n. 2 (1998); Ariz. R.Crim.
State v. White 982 P.2d 819 Ariz. 1999
Demasse v. ITT Corp. 984 P.2d 1138 Ariz. 1999
Demasse v. ITT Corp. 984 P.2d 1138 Ariz. 1999
Demasse v. ITT Corp. 984 P.2d 1138 Ariz. 1999
Demasse v. ITT Corp. 984 P.2d 1138 Ariz. 1999
State v. Medina 975 P.2d 94 Ariz. 1999
State v. Sharp 973 P.2d 1171 Ariz. 1999
State v. Sharp 973 P.2d 1171 Ariz. 1999
444 n. 2, n. 2 (1998); Ariz. R.Crim.