Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Getz, 944 P.2d 503.

72 citing documents.

State v. Arbolida 78 P.3d 275 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Arbolida 78 P.3d 275 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Keener 75 P.3d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Keener 75 P.3d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Christian 66 P.3d 1241 Ariz. 2003
State v. Christian 66 P.3d 1241 Ariz. 2003
State v. Bass 31 P.3d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
State v. Bass 31 P.3d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
State v. Flynt 13 P.3d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
State v. Flynt 13 P.3d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
State v. Kessler 13 P.3d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Kessler 13 P.3d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
501 , 7 L.Ed.2d 446 (1962); Moss v. Homig, 314 F.2d 89, 92 (2nd Cir.1963), disapproved on other grounds
State v. Wood 8 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Wood 8 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
In re Richard G. 995 P.2d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
In re Richard G. 995 P.2d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
State v. Haley 978 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
State v. Haley 978 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
“The best and most reliable index of a statute’s meaning is its language and, where the language is clear and unequivocal, it is determinative of a statute’s construction.” , quoting Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2, 164 Ariz. at 33 , 790 P.2d at 731 .
State v. Malvern 962 P.2d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
State v. Malvern 962 P.2d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
¶ 3 “It is our duty to ascertain the intent of the legislature in interpreting a statute.” , quoting In re Pima County Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2
Stewart v. Travers 965 P.2d 67 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Stewart v. Travers 965 P.2d 67 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998