Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Garcia-Contreras, 953 P.2d 536.

68 citing documents.

State v. Morris 160 P.3d 203 Ariz. 2007
State v. Morris 160 P.3d 203 Ariz. 2007
State v. Walker 95 P.3d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Walker 95 P.3d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
¶ 13 , ("We should be wary of accuseds who attempt to 'frustrate the process of justice’ ...
State v. Whitley 85 P.3d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Whitley 85 P.3d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Dann 74 P.3d 231 Ariz. 2003
State v. Dann 74 P.3d 231 Ariz. 2003
1482, 1485 , 84 L.Ed.2d 486 (1985); ¶ 8
State v. Sullivan 69 P.3d 1006 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Sullivan 69 P.3d 1006 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
¶ 17 Following United States Supreme Court decisions, Arizona law holds that “[a] criminal trial undermined by structural error ‘cannot reliably seive its function as a vehicle for determination of guilt or innoeence[.]’ ” ¶ 15 , (quoting Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 310 , 111 S.Ct.
State v. Canion 16 P.3d 788 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Canion 16 P.3d 788 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Smith 4 P.3d 388 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
State v. Smith 4 P.3d 388 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
¶ 20 Harmless error is “ordinary trial error that, in the context of all the evidence, is amenable to quantitative assessment.”
State v. Reed 992 P.2d 1132 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
State v. Reed 992 P.2d 1132 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
However, “[a] defendant may voluntarily relinquish the right to attend trial.”
State v. Guytan 968 P.2d 587 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Guytan 968 P.2d 587 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998