Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Lee, 959 P.2d 799.

62 citing documents.

State v. Gonzalez 278 P.3d 328 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
typically displayed by persons trafficking in illegal drugs.” ¶ 10 , (citing Reid v. Georgia, 448 U.S. 438, 440-41 , 100 S.Ct.
State v. Sweeney 227 P.3d 868 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. Sweeney 227 P.3d 868 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Rayes 141 P.3d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Demarce v. Willrich 56 P.3d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Demarce v. Willrich 56 P.3d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
(noting that a judge is imbued with ‘Vide latitude” to approve or reject a plea bargain).
State v. Bass 31 P.3d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
State v. Bass 31 P.3d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Bass argued that such testimony would constitute inadmissible “profile”
State v. Logan 17 P.3d 101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Logan 17 P.3d 101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
(profile evidence may not be used to prove drug courier activity).
Beijer v. ADAMS EX REL. COUNTY OF COCONINO 993 P.2d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Beijer v. ADAMS EX REL. COUNTY OF COCONINO 993 P.2d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
The trial court granted the Defendant’s request for a