Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Bocharski, 22 P.3d 43.

58 citing documents.

Webb v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Bd. of Medical Examiners 48 P.3d 505 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Webb v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Bd. of Medical Examiners 48 P.3d 505 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
¶ 56 , , (waiver requires one to intentionally relinquish a known right); A.J.
State v. Jones 49 P.3d 273 Ariz. 2002
State v. Jones 49 P.3d 273 Ariz. 2002
It is true that the state “cannot 13 be compelled to try its case in a sterile setting.” ¶ 25, ¶ 25 (2001) (quoting Chapple, 135 Ariz. at 289-90, 660 P.2d at 1216-17).
State v. O'DELL 46 P.3d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. O'DELL 46 P.3d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
¶¶ 42-43 , ¶¶ 42-43 (2001)
Calderon-Palomino v. Nichols 36 P.3d 767 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Calderon-Palomino v. Nichols 36 P.3d 767 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
1087, 1093 , 84 L.Ed.2d 53, 62 (1985); , , (“So long as the law permits capital sentencing, Arizona’s justice system must provide adequate resources to enable indigents to defend themselves in a reasonable way.”).