CR-97-0353-PR
Precedential
Dismissed
Processed
State v. Ramirez
Cited by
- Beau Hodai v. the City of Tucson and Tucson Police Department 365 P.3d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
- McKee v. Peoria Unified School District 338 P.3d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Hon. chavez/robert Lee Gill 321 P.3d 420 Ariz. 2014
- State v. Welty 308 P.3d 1159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. City of Phoenix 267 P.3d 1185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
- Arpaio v. Davis 210 P.3d 1287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
- Joseph M. Arpaio v. Citizen Publishing Co. Mark Kimble Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
- Phoenix New Times, L.L.C. v. Arpaio 177 P.3d 275 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
- Griffis v. Pinal County 156 P.3d 418 Ariz. 2007
- Griffis v. Pinal County 141 P.3d 780 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
- Primary Consultants, L.L.C. v. Maricopa County Recorder 111 P.3d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
- London v. Broderick 80 P.3d 769 Ariz. 2003
Opinion text
ORDER After hearing oral argument and considering further the pleadings filed, it appears to the Court that the grant of review in this case was improvident. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the order granting review is vacated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Review is dismissed. Justice Martone and Judge Brammer dissent from the dismissal of the Petition for Review.