Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. O'MEARA, 9 P.3d 325.

36 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Asalia Guadalupe Alvarez-Soto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State of Arizona v. Asalia Guadalupe Alvarez-Soto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
In other words, “[b]y definition, reasonable suspicion is something short of probable cause.” Teagle, (quoting State v. O’Meara, ).
State v. Sidor 558 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Sidor 558 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
–98 ¶¶ 14–15 (App. 1998) (cautioning courts to “be wary of granting much weight to a law enforcement officer’s subjective observation that a defendant was nervous” absent “‘dramatic’ indications of nervousness” that “both objectify and quantify the nervousness exhibited”) (overruled in part on another ground, State v. O’Meara, ).
State v. Douglas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Douglas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Perez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Perez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶32 Although each reason alone may have an innocent explanation, we do not “parse out each individual factor, categorize it as potentially innocent, and reject it.” State v. O’Meara, ¶ 10 (2000).
State v. Lincourt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lincourt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Gonzalez-Gutierrez, 187 Ariz. at 118 (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417-18 (1981)); accord State v. O’Meara, ¶ 7 (2000) (quoting Cortez, 449 U.S. at 417-18).
State v. Paul Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Paul Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
See State v. O’Meara, ¶ 10 (2000).
State of Arizona v. Angel Pete Ruiz 372 P.3d 323 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Angel Pete Ruiz 372 P.3d 323 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
¶8 “‘Reasonable suspicion is something short of probable cause,’” quoting State v. O’Meara, but more than a mere “inchoate ‘hunch,’” id.
State v. Galaviz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Galaviz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. O’Meara, -96, ¶ 7, -27 (2000) 4 STATE v. GALAVIZ Decision of the Court (citation omitted).
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 359 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 359 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
1375 , 146 L.Ed.2d 254 (2000); State v. O’Meara
State v. Woods 342 P.3d 863 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Woods 342 P.3d 863 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“By definition, reasonable suspicion is something short of probable cause.” State v. O’Meara, ¶ 10
State v. Mucciarone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Mucciarone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶21 “By definition, reasonable suspicion is something short of probable cause.” State v. O’Meara, ¶ 10
State of Arizona v. William Peter Moran 307 P.3d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. William Peter Moran 307 P.3d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Nelson Ivan Boteo-Flores 280 P.3d 1239 Ariz. 2012
State of Arizona v. Nelson Ivan Boteo-Flores 280 P.3d 1239 Ariz. 2012
Reasonable suspicion requires “a particularized and objective basis for suspecting that a person is engaged in criminal activity.” State v. O’Meara, 198 Ariz. 294, 295 ¶ 7
State v. Sweeney 227 P.3d 868 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. Sweeney 227 P.3d 868 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Instead, [we] must look at all of the factors, (all of which would have a potentially innocent explanation, or else there would be probable cause), and examine them collectively.” State v. O’Meara, ¶ 10
State of Arizona v. Lemon Montrea Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
State of Arizona v. Lemon Montrea Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
We do not view the relevant facts in isolation, but instead must determine whether the officer’s conclusions were reasonable after “evaluat[ing] the totality of the circumstances.” State v. O’Meara
State of Arizona v. Billie Marie Fornof Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State of Arizona v. Billie Marie Fornof Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266, State v. O’Meara, P.3d 325 (2000), P.2d 1135 (App. 1999), involved reasonable suspicion grounded in cumulative information that had been gathered from an extended period of observation or investigation and/or based on a clear-cut violation of traffic laws.2 1 Fornof relies pr
State v. Teagle 170 P.3d 266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Teagle 170 P.3d 266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
“By definition, reasonable suspicion is something short of probable cause.” State v. O’Meara, ¶ 10 , (O’Meara II).
Tornabene v. Bonine Ex Rel. Arizona Highway Department 54 P.3d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Tornabene v. Bonine Ex Rel. Arizona Highway Department 54 P.3d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
See also State v. O’Meara, , Richcreek, 187 Ariz. at 503-04 , 930 P.2d at 1306-07 .