Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Linthicum v. Nationwide Life Insurance, 723 P.2d 675.

144 citing documents.

Strawberry Water Co. v. Paulsen 207 P.3d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Co., , (listing victim compensation and private law enforcement among rationales for punitive damages).
Security Title Agency, Inc. v. Pope 200 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Co., -32 , -81 (1986)); see also Hyatt Regency Phoenix Hotel Co. v. Winston & Strawn, , (“To recover punitive damages, a plaintiff must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant engaged in aggravated and outrageous conduct with an evil
Mein Ex Rel. Mein v. Cook 193 P.3d 790 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Mein Ex Rel. Mein v. Cook 193 P.3d 790 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Co., , ("Therefore, while a plaintiff may collect compensatory damages upon proof by a preponderance of the evidence of his injuries due to the tort of another, we conclude that recovery of punitive damages should be awardable only upon clear and convincing evidence of the defendant’s evil min
Catherine E. Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLC Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Catherine E. Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLC Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Co., -32, -81 (1986) (alteration in Medasys).
Tritschler v. Allstate Insurance Co., Better Way Services Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Tritschler v. Allstate Insurance Co., Better Way Services Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Chilton v. Center for Biological Diversity, Inc. 148 P.3d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Chilton v. Center for Biological Diversity, Inc. 148 P.3d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
our supreme court stated a court must find an “evil mind” to support the imposition of punitive damages, and “[t]he key is the wrongdoer’s intent to injure the plaintiff or his deliberate interference with the rights of others, consciously disregarding the unjustifiably substantial
Medasys Acquisition Corp. v. SDMS, P.C. 55 P.3d 763 Ariz. 2002
Medasys Acquisition Corp. v. SDMS, P.C. 55 P.3d 763 Ariz. 2002
Co., -32, -81 (1986); Fousel, 124 Ariz. at 130, 602 P.2d at 511.
Haralson v. Fisher Surveying, Inc. 31 P.3d 114 Ariz. 2001
Haralson v. Fisher Surveying, Inc. 31 P.3d 114 Ariz. 2001
Saucedo Ex Rel. Sinaloa v. Salvation Army 24 P.3d 1274 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Saucedo Ex Rel. Sinaloa v. Salvation Army 24 P.3d 1274 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Johnson v. Pankratz 2 P.3d 1266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Johnson v. Pankratz 2 P.3d 1266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Schmitz v. Aston 3 P.3d 1184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Schmitz v. Aston 3 P.3d 1184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Hilgeman v. American Mortgage Securities, Inc. 994 P.2d 1030 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Hilgeman v. American Mortgage Securities, Inc. 994 P.2d 1030 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Hyatt Regency Phoenix Hotel Co. v. Winston & Strawn 907 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Hyatt Regency Phoenix Hotel Co. v. Winston & Strawn 907 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Piper v. Bear Medical Systems, Inc. 883 P.2d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Piper v. Bear Medical Systems, Inc. 883 P.2d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Fobes v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. 861 P.2d 692 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Fobes v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. 861 P.2d 692 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Co., , but also failed to support a judgment for punitive damages.
Newman v. Sun Valley Crushing Co. 844 P.2d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Newman v. Sun Valley Crushing Co. 844 P.2d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Co., , our supreme court examined in detail the definitions various courts have used to describe mental states such as wilful, wanton, reckless and malicious, for the purpose of determining what standard to apply when dealing with punitive damages.
Rhue v. Dawson 841 P.2d 215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Rhue v. Dawson 841 P.2d 215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Deese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 838 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1992
Deese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 838 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1992
Co., , aff'd in part, , the court of appeals observed that “[t]he tort of bad faith only arises when the insurance company intentionally denies or fails to process or pay a claim without a reasonable basis for such action.
Thompson v. Better-Bilt Aluminum Products Co. 832 P.2d 203 Ariz. 1992
Thompson v. Better-Bilt Aluminum Products Co. 832 P.2d 203 Ariz. 1992
Hooper v. Truly Nolen of America, Inc. 832 P.2d 709 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Hooper v. Truly Nolen of America, Inc. 832 P.2d 709 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Walter v. Simmons 818 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Walter v. Simmons 818 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Orme School v. Reeves 802 P.2d 1000 Ariz. 1990
Orme School v. Reeves 802 P.2d 1000 Ariz. 1990
Co., -32 , (punitive damages); General Accident Fire & , (common law fraud).
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Stevens 802 P.2d 1071 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Stevens 802 P.2d 1071 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
490 , 74 L.Ed.2d 632 (1982)
Elliott v. Videan 791 P.2d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Elliott v. Videan 791 P.2d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Ball v. Prentice 781 P.2d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Ball v. Prentice 781 P.2d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Yetman v. English 786 P.2d 403 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Yetman v. English 786 P.2d 403 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Gurule v. Illinois Mutual Life & Casualty Co.