Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Ford v. Revlon, Inc., 734 P.2d 580.
- Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners AD 747 P.2d 1218 Ariz. 1987
-
Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners AD
747 P.2d 1218
Ariz. 1987
Thus, whether the action for breach was pleaded in contract, in tort, or both, whether it involved the breach of an express or implied covenant, the action in Sparks and similar cases (see, e.g., Ford v. Revlon, Inc., , ) “arises out of a contract.” Quite the opposite is true with regard to the contracts arising from relationships between professionals and their clients and from other special relationships long recognized at common law, such as those between innkeeper and guest, common carrier a
- Pankratz v. Willis 744 P.2d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- Pankratz v. Willis 744 P.2d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- Holt v. Utica Mutual Insurance 759 P.2d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
-
Holt v. Utica Mutual Insurance
759 P.2d 617
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
See Ford v. Revlon, Inc., -45 , -87 (1987).
- Lapare v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz. 742 P.2d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- Lapare v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz. 742 P.2d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987