Cited by

Comm’n, –16 (1987) (citation omitted).

Comm’n, (“We do not weigh the evidence, but consider it in the light most favorable for sustaining the award.”).

Comm’n, (“We do not weigh the evidence, but consider it in the light most favorable for sustaining the award.”).

Comm’n, Malinski, 103 Ariz. at 216, 439 P.2d at 488.

Comm’n, (citations omitted).

Comm’n, (supp. op.); Magma Copper Co. v. Indus.

Cf., -14 , -24 (1987) (defining compensation claim for purposes of accrual of statute of limitations); see also Ray K. Harris, Note, Res Judicata And Reopening Workers' Compensation Claims In Arizona, 23 Ariz.L.Rev.

See Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial Comm’n, , (claimant has burden of proving circumstances excusing failure to report forthwith injury to employer).

See Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial Comm’n, , Magma Copper Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, , Riley v. Industrial Comm’n, 24 Ariz.App.

As we have noted, “the time for filing a workers’ compensation claim begins to run when the injured employee perceives the nature and seriousness of the injury and recognizes the causal relationship between his injury and his employment.” Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial Comm’n

Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, -56 , (quoted in Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial Comm’n, -14 , -24 (1987)).