Cited by

Comm’n, (“The reason an unscheduled injury need not be ‘rated’ so long as it results in some disability is that there is often little relationship between the injury and the resulting disability.

Comm'n, (ALJ resolves conflicting medical expert testimony); Kaibab Indus.

Comm’n, the ALJ adopted the testimony of Dr. Powers as “most probably correct.” Robinson has shown no error in the ALJ declining to accept Dr. Pandey’s opinion and determining Dr. Powers’s testimony and opinion were more credible.

Comm’n, (explaining resolution of conflicting expert opinions may include consideration of each expert’s qualifications, experience, and basis for opinion).

Comm’n, (citation omitted).

Comm’n, Malinski v. Indus.

Comm’n, (citation omitted).

Comm’n, the ALJ adopted the testimony of Dr. Salyer as “more probably correct.” And Dr. Salyer’s testimony was sufficient to support a determination that Daniel’s injuries were medically stationary and that she suffered no permanent impairment.

Comm’n, (citation omitted).

Comm’n, Malinski, 103 Ariz. at 217, 439 P.2d at 489; Holding v. Indus.

Comm’n, Malinski, 103 Ariz. at 217, 439 P.2d at 489; Holding v. Indus.

Comm’n, as well as biases which might affect their credibility, see Walters, 134 Ariz. at 599.

Comm’n, see also Castillo v. Indus.

Comm’n, (“An award of the Commission will be affirmed if it can be supported by any reasonable theory of evidence.”).