Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Creach v. Angulo, 941 P.2d 224.

61 citing documents.

Lindsey M. v. Rizona Department of Economic Security 127 P.3d 59 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Lindsey M. v. Rizona Department of Economic Security 127 P.3d 59 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
-15 , -27 (1997) (to justify reversal, error must have been substantial and prejudicial); In re Pima County Severance Action No. S-2710, , (no reversal of termination because juvenile court’s failure to order social study did not prejudice parent).
Monica C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 118 P.3d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Monica C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 118 P.3d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
(observing it was clearly error for court not to comply with civil procedure rules).
Childress Buick Co. v. O'CONNELL 11 P.3d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Childress Buick Co. v. O'CONNELL 11 P.3d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
approved, -14 , -26 , (1997).
Hill v. City of Phoenix 975 P.2d 700 Ariz. 1999
Hill v. City of Phoenix 975 P.2d 700 Ariz. 1999
This court defines harmless error as error "of such technical, non-prejudicial character that neither party may raise a legitimate or meritorious basis of complaint.”
State v. Flournoy 971 P.2d 197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Flournoy 971 P.2d 197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
-52 , -93 (App.1996), approved by , (dictum is not binding precedent).
Hill v. Maricopa County 950 P.2d 1179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997