Cited by

Fund, ¶ 98 (2002) (citation omitted).

es to an action “to enforce any of the terms of this Agreement,” and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is not “an express term of the PPA.” Under Arizona law, however, the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is “as much a part of the contract as are the express terms.” Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters and Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶ 59 (2002).

Fund, ¶¶ 69–70 (2002); Maleki v. Desert Palms Prof’l Props., L.L.C., ¶ 28 (App. 2009).

Fund, n.24, ¶ 98 (2002).

¶17 “Arizona recognizes aiding and abetting as embodied in Restatement § 876(b), that a person who aids and abets a tortfeasor is himself liable for the resulting harm to a third person.” Wells Fargo v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters and Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶ 31 (2002) (citation omitted).

Fund, ¶ 13 (2002) (citation omitted).

¶ 12 (2003); Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶ 13 (2002).

Fund, ¶ 19 (2002) (“Negligence .

We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, and view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.8 Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶ 13 (2002).

Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶ 13 (2002).

Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, –99, ¶ 99 (2002).

Dist., ¶ 8 (App. 2013) (citing Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶¶ 13-14 (2002); Orme Sch.

Fund, ¶ 59 (2002) (“Such implied terms are as much a part of a contract as the express terms.”) (citations omitted).

Fund , , 482, ¶ 13, , 20 (2002).

Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶ 13 (2002).