Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Tru…, 38 P.3d 12.

259 citing documents.

Valley Forge Insurance Co. v. Sam's Plumbing Thomas, Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
See Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters & 3 Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶¶ 13-14
Chalpin v. Snyder 207 P.3d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Chalpin v. Snyder 207 P.3d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons, ¶ 13
Security Title Agency, Inc. v. Pope 200 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Security Title Agency, Inc. v. Pope 200 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶ 31 , , 23 (2002).
Highland Village Partners, LLC v. BRADBURY & STAMM CONSTRUCTION CO. 195 P.3d 184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Highland Village Partners, LLC v. BRADBURY & STAMM CONSTRUCTION CO. 195 P.3d 184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶ 59 , , 28 (2002).
Greenwood v. State 175 P.3d 687 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Greenwood v. State 175 P.3d 687 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶¶ 13-14 , , 20 (2002).
Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass'n 167 P.3d 1277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass'n 167 P.3d 1277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶ 59
Neonatology Associates, Ltd. v. Phoenix Perinatal Associates Inc. 164 P.3d 691 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Neonatology Associates, Ltd. v. Phoenix Perinatal Associates Inc. 164 P.3d 691 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, , 482 ¶ 13
Dube v. Likins Powell Hixon Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Dube v. Likins Powell Hixon Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Wells Fargo Bank 8 v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶¶ 33-34
Dawson v. Withycombe 160 P.3d 1157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Dawson v. Withycombe 160 P.3d 1157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters and Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶ 19 , , 21 (2002).
Airfreight Express, Ltd. v. Evergreen Air Center, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Airfreight Express, Ltd. v. Evergreen Air Center, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
See Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395, n. 18, n. 18 (2002) (“Proof of a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing requires a preponderance of the evidence.”).
Patterson v. Thunder Pass, Inc. 153 P.3d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Patterson v. Thunder Pass, Inc. 153 P.3d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶ 13 , , 20 (2002); Strojnik v. Gen.
Gipson v. Kasey 150 P.3d 228 Ariz. 2007
Gipson v. Kasey 150 P.3d 228 Ariz. 2007
See Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters and Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, , 483-84 ¶ 20, , 21-22 (2002).
Johnson v. Earnhardt's Gilbert Dodge, Inc. 132 P.3d 825 Ariz. 2006
Johnson v. Earnhardt's Gilbert Dodge, Inc. 132 P.3d 825 Ariz. 2006
¶15 “Summary judgment is appropriate only if no genuine issues of material fact exist and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶ 14, (citing Ariz. R. Civ.
United Dairymen of Arizona v. Schugg 128 P.3d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
United Dairymen of Arizona v. Schugg 128 P.3d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
E.g., Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, -91, ¶¶ 59-60 , , 28-29 (2002); -54 , -70 (1986); Enyart v. Transamerica Ins.
Jennifer G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 123 P.3d 186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Jennifer G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 123 P.3d 186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Otherwise, the evidence and all reasonable inferences must be viewed in favor of the party opposing the motion, see Wells Fargo Bank 10 v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, and credibility determinations are inappropriate for summary judgment.
Safeway Ins. Co., Inc. v. Guerrero 106 P.3d 1020 Ariz. 2005
Safeway Ins. Co., Inc. v. Guerrero 106 P.3d 1020 Ariz. 2005
Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust, ¶ 74
American Pepper Supply Co. v. Federal Insurance 93 P.3d 507 Ariz. 2004
American Pepper Supply Co. v. Federal Insurance 93 P.3d 507 Ariz. 2004
¶ 14 (citing Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, n.24, ¶ 98, n.24 (2002)).
Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6 93 P.3d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6 93 P.3d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
See Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶¶ 13-14 , , 20 (2002); Orme Sch.
Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw & Villamana, P.C. v. Pima County 88 P.3d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw & Villamana, P.C. v. Pima County 88 P.3d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
See Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, , , ¶ 59 (2002).
Safeway Ins. Co., Inc. v. Guerrero 83 P.3d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Safeway Ins. Co., Inc. v. Guerrero 83 P.3d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
The Tort of Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations ¶ 14 As described in Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters and Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶ 74 , , 31 (2002), the tort of intentional interference with contractual relations has five elements: A prima facie case of intentional interference requires: (1) existence of a valid contractual relationship, (2) knowledge of the relationship on the part of the interferor, (3) intentional interferen
Bentivegna v. Powers Steel & Wire Products, Inc. 81 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Bentivegna v. Powers Steel & Wire Products, Inc. 81 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
“Summary judgment is appropriate only if no genuine issues of material fact exist and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters and Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶ 13 , , 20 (2002) (citations omitted).
American Pepper Supply Co. v. Federal Insurance 72 P.3d 1284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
American Pepper Supply Co. v. Federal Insurance 72 P.3d 1284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
¶ 98, n. 24, n. 24 (2002) (citations omitted) (fraudulent *469 concealment); 5 -28 , -77 (1949) (constructive fraud); , (undue influence).
Duncan v. Scottsdale Medical Imaging, Ltd. 70 P.3d 435 Ariz. 2003
Duncan v. Scottsdale Medical Imaging, Ltd. 70 P.3d 435 Ariz. 2003
Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters and Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶ 13
Galati v. America West Airlines, Inc. 69 P.3d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
¶ 11 In support of his claim that federal regulations should be included under the umbrella of public policy, Galati cites Wagenseller, , ; , , depublished
Andrews v. Blake 69 P.3d 7 Ariz. 2003
Andrews v. Blake 69 P.3d 7 Ariz. 2003
Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund
Hohokam Irrigation & Drainage District v. Arizona Public Service Co. 64 P.3d 836 Ariz. 2003
Hohokam Irrigation & Drainage District v. Arizona Public Service Co. 64 P.3d 836 Ariz. 2003
Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters and Cement Masons Local No. -5- 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶13