Cited by

§ 12–910(E); ¶ 9 (2001).

¶ 13, (internal quotation and citation omitted) (“The trustee is under a duty to the beneficiary to use reasonable care and skill to preserve the trust property.”).

¶ 7 “When an agency decision is based on factual determinations, judicial review is limited to determining whether the administrative action was an abuse of discretion.” -59, ¶ 9 , -68 (2001).

¶7 The State Land Department is responsible for administering the trust lands, ¶ 2, but neither the Enabling Act nor Arizona’s Constitution identifies how the administrative costs associated with managing the lands will be funded.

§ 37-102 (Supp. 2010); ¶ 2

¶ 9 , Eaton, 206 Ariz. at 432, ¶ 7 , 79 P.3d at 1046 ; Defenders of Wildlife, 199 Ariz. at 417, ¶ 9, 18 P.3d at 728; see also United States v. Appalachian Elec.

Enabling Act §§ 24, 25, 28; Asarco I, 155 Ariz. at 486, 747 P.2d at 1185.

(auditors); ¶ 13, (trustees).

Wells, , (state land commissioner subject to same fiduciary obligations as any private trustee and has duty to “preserve [state] trust property and make it productive”).

-59, ¶ 9, -68 (2001) (“[I]f the administrative decision was based on an interpretation of law, it is reviewed de novo.”).