Cited by

Co., ¶ 5 (2001); Reyes v. Frank’s Serv.

Co., ¶ 9 (2001); see also Fowler v. Great Am.

Co ., , 392, ¶ 6, , 740 (2001).

Co., ¶ 6 (2001) ("A party to a civil action cannot recover its litigation expenses as costs without statutory authorization.").

Co., , 392 ¶¶ 7-8, (noting that “under section 12-332.A.6, the parties may agree to share [otherwise nontaxable] costs or impose them on the losing party”).

Co., n.3, ¶ 7 (App. 2000) (“It is well recognized that ‘costs’ and ‘expenses’ are not the same, and that ‘costs’ is a term of art referring only to recoverable expenses.”), vacated on other grounds

Co., ¶ 5 , (expert witness fees and costs); Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc., -88 , -32 (App.1983) (explaining how to determine reasonable attorneys’ fees based on billing rates, hours expended, success of claims); see also, e.g., A.R.S.

Co., 740 (2001) (legislature has limited recoverable costs).

Co., , 413 n. 3, ¶7, , 468 n. 3 (App.2000) (“It is well recognized that ‘costs’ and ‘expenses’ are not the same, and that ‘costs’ is a term of art referring only to recoverable expenses.”), vacated on other grounds

Co., ¶ 17 , (“The policy argument ...

Co., 197 Ariz. 411, 413 n.3, ¶ 7, n.3 (App. 2000) (“It is well recognized that ‘costs’ and ‘expenses’ are not the same, and that ‘costs’ is a term of art referring only to recoverable expenses.”), vacated on other grounds, P.3d 739 (2001).