Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite People's Choice TV Corp. v. City of Tucson, 46 P.3d 412.

60 citing documents.

SFPP, L.P. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 108 P.3d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
SFPP, L.P. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 108 P.3d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 105 P.3d 1163 Ariz. 2005
Walgreen Arizona Drug Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 97 P.3d 896 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Walgreen Arizona Drug Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 97 P.3d 896 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
See People’s Choice TV Corp., ¶ 7
Riepe v. Riepe 91 P.3d 312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State Ex Rel. Department of Revenue v. Capitol Castings, Inc. 88 P.3d 159 Ariz. 2004
State Ex Rel. Department of Revenue v. Capitol Castings, Inc. 88 P.3d 159 Ariz. 2004
When interpreting statutes, we strive to “discern and give effect to legislative intent.” People’s ¶ 7
State ex rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Capitol Castings, Inc. 69 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State ex rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Capitol Castings, Inc. 69 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
¶ 21 Capitol further argues that, in People’s , 403 ¶ 7, the supreme court applied to an exemption statute the traditional rule that taxing statutes are to be construed in favor of the taxpayer.