Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Stewart v. Smith, 46 P.3d 1067.

56 citing documents.

State v. Shrum 203 P.3d 1175 Ariz. 2009
State v. Shrum 203 P.3d 1175 Ariz. 2009
¶12 “[T]o prevent endless or nearly endless reviews of the same case in the same trial court,” Stewart v. Smith, 202 Ariz. 446, 450 ¶ 11, Rule 32.2(a) precludes collateral relief on a ground that either was or could have been raised on direct appeal or in a previous PCR proceeding.
State of Arizona v. Samuel Wayne Swoopes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State of Arizona v. Samuel Wayne Swoopes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State of Arizona v. Adam Albert Rosales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State of Arizona v. Adam Albert Rosales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
(“Rule 32.2 is a rule of preclusion designed to limit those reviews, to prevent endless or nearly endless reviews of the same case in the same trial court.”).