Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Andrews v. Blake, 69 P.3d 7.
- Wickham v. Hopkins 250 P.3d 245 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
- Lee v. State 242 P.3d 175 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
-
Lee v. State
242 P.3d 175
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
the supreme court held that, when a claimant presents proof that a notice of claim was properly mailed to the proper authorities, it creates a rebuttable presumption that the notice was received, and whether the State received the notice of claim is an issue to be determined by the factfinder: We h
- McReynolds v. American Commerce Insurance 235 P.3d 278 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- McReynolds v. American Commerce Insurance 235 P.3d 278 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- Perry v. Honorable Emmet Ronan 234 P.3d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- Perry v. Honorable Emmet Ronan 234 P.3d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- City of Chandler v. Arizona Department of Transportation 231 P.3d 932 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- City of Chandler v. Arizona Department of Transportation 231 P.3d 932 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- Taser International, Inc. v. Ward 231 P.3d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- Taser International, Inc. v. Ward 231 P.3d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- Estate of DeSela v. Prescott Unified School District No. 1 228 P.3d 938 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- Loiselle v. COSAS MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC 228 P.3d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
-
Estate of DeSela v. Prescott Unified School District No. 1
228 P.3d 938
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
¶ 12 , (citation omitted).
- Loiselle v. COSAS MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC 228 P.3d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- Edwards v. Board of Supervisors 229 P.3d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- Edwards v. Board of Supervisors 229 P.3d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- In Re General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System & Source 224 P.3d 178 Ariz. 2010
- In Re: Gila River System Ariz. 2010
-
In Re General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System & Source
224 P.3d 178
Ariz. 2010
and Source (Gila River VI), , 69 ¶ 12, , 240 ¶ 12
-
In Re: Gila River System
Ariz. 2010
and Source (Gila River VI), ¶ 12, ¶ 12
- Maleki v. Desert Palms Professional Properties, L.L.C. 214 P.3d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
-
Maleki v. Desert Palms Professional Properties, L.L.C.
214 P.3d 415
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
See, ¶ 24 , (“Generally, Arizona courts have strictly construed options in lease agreements because such provisions allow the optionee freedom to exercise or not exercise the option, whereas the optionor is bound by the option.”); Univ.
- Ratliff v. Hardison 199 P.3d 696 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
- Ratliff v. Hardison 199 P.3d 696 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
- Lee v. State 182 P.3d 1169 Ariz. 2008
-
Lee v. State
182 P.3d 1169
Ariz. 2008
242 ¶ 22 n. 3, , 13 n. 3 (2003).
- Lowe v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
-
Lowe v. Pima County
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
(no award of fees under A.R.S.
- State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. Waldren 171 P.3d 1214 Ariz. 2007
- State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. Waldren 171 P.3d 1214 Ariz. 2007
- Dawson v. Withycombe 163 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
- Dawson v. Withycombe 163 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
- Lee v. State 161 P.3d 583 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
-
Lee v. State
161 P.3d 583
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
See Mays, 96 Ariz. at 366 , 395 P.2d at 719 (affirming trial court’s admission of letter regarding a bank’s closure of defendant’s account, which defendant denied receiving, based on mailing presumption and additional evidence that supported the presumption that defendant had received the letter); , (applying mailing presumption and determining that questions of fact existed regarding whether defendant had sent a letter exercising his option under a lease); Gov’t Employees Ins.
- Aranda v. Cardenas, M.D. Nes Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
- Aranda v. Cardenas, M.D. Nes Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
- Dawson v. Withycombe 160 P.3d 1157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
- Dawson v. Withycombe 160 P.3d 1157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
- Antone v. Greater Arizona Auto Auction, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
- Antone v. Greater Arizona Auto Auction, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
- Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. Weitz Co. 158 P.3d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
- Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. Weitz Co. 158 P.3d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
- Allstate Indemnity Company v. Lisa Ridgely Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
- Allstate Indemnity Company v. Lisa Ridgely Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
- Acosta v. Phoenix Indemnity Insurance Company Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
- Acosta v. Phoenix Indemnity Insurance Company Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
- Corbett v. Manorcare of America, Inc. 146 P.3d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
- Corbett v. Manorcare of America, Inc. 146 P.3d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
- Hamblin v. State 143 P.3d 388 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006