Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Glaze v. Larsen, 83 P.3d 26.

78 citing documents.

Rogone v. Correia 335 P.3d 1122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Rogone v. Correia 335 P.3d 1122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Iknadosian v. Mahon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Iknadosian v. Mahon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 10, 2 As a result, Appellants were required to serve Mahon with a notice of claim no later than August 12, 2011.
Caruso v. Caruso Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Caruso v. Caruso Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 20, John M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Klee v. Lunn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Klee v. Lunn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 12, (citation omitted).
A-Plan v. Quarles & Brady Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
A-Plan v. Quarles & Brady Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
§ 12-542; n.1, ¶ 15, n.1 (2004) (recognizing the standard applicable in a legal malpractice action arising in a non-litigation context).
Rogers v. Board of Regents of the University of Arizona 311 P.3d 1075 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Rogers v. Board of Regents of the University of Arizona 311 P.3d 1075 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Walsh v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists Chartered 273 P.3d 645 Ariz. 2012
Walsh v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists Chartered 273 P.3d 645 Ariz. 2012
Best Choice Fund, LLC v. Low & Childers, P.C. 269 P.3d 678 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Best Choice Fund, LLC v. Low & Childers, P.C. 269 P.3d 678 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
*507 Accrual date ¶ 12 A legal malpractice claim accrues when “(1) the plaintiff knows or reasonably should know of the attorney’s negligent conduct; and (2) the plaintiffs damages are ascertainable, and not speculative or contingent.” ¶ 13 , (quoting Kiley v. Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, , ).
Walsh v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists Chartered 258 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Walsh v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists Chartered 258 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
FLAGSTAFF AFFORDABLE HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. Design Alliance Inc. 212 P.3d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
FLAGSTAFF AFFORDABLE HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. Design Alliance Inc. 212 P.3d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
See, ¶¶ 12-13 , (discussing basic elements of attorney malpractice); , (recognizing tort of professional negligence against accountant and applying two-year statute of limitations requirement applicable to tort claims).
Beynon v. TREZZA 211 P.3d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Beynon v. TREZZA 211 P.3d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
“As with all negligence claims, a plaintiff asserting legal malpractice must prove the existence of a duty, breach of duty, that the defendant’s negligence was the actual and proximate cause of injury, and the ‘nature and extent’ of damages.” , see also Molever, 152 Ariz. at 371 , 732 P.2d at 1109
Maria A. Keonjian v. Timothy A. Olcott, P.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Maria A. Keonjian v. Timothy A. Olcott, P.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
¶12 In the other two cases relied upon by Keonjian, P.3d 26 (2004), P.2d 792 (1983), the issue was when a cause of action accrues for legal malpractice that occurred in the course of litigation.
Dube v. Likins Powell Hixon Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Dube v. Likins Powell Hixon Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
(“The determination of when a cause of action accrues requires an analysis of the elements of the claim presented.”).
Andrew Mullin v. Brown Chapa Fields Linden Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Andrew Mullin v. Brown Chapa Fields Linden Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005