Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Bilke v. State, 80 P.3d 269.
- State v. Aguilar 97 P.3d 865 Ariz. 2004
-
State v. Aguilar
97 P.3d 865
Ariz. 2004
-65, ¶ 11, -72 (2003) (applying rules of statutory construction to statute governing interlocutory appeals).
- John C. Lincoln Hospital v. Maricopa County 96 P.3d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
- Followed John C. Lincoln Hospital v. Maricopa County 96 P.3d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
- Western Corrections Group, Inc. v. Tierney 96 P.3d 1070 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
- Western Corrections Group, Inc. v. Tierney 96 P.3d 1070 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
- Carl Seel v. Tim Sifert Ariz. 2004
-
Carl Seel v. Tim Sifert
Ariz. 2004
“If the language is clear, the court must ‘apply it without resorting to other methods of statutory interpretation.’” ¶ 11, (citing Hayes v. Cont’l Ins.
- North Valley Emergency, Specialists, L.L.C. v. Santana 93 P.3d 501 Ariz. 2004
-
North Valley Emergency, Specialists, L.L.C. v. Santana
93 P.3d 501
Ariz. 2004
In addition, “[i]f the language is clear, the court must ‘apply it without resorting to other methods of statutory interpretation,’ unless application of the plain meaning would lead to impossible or absurd results.” ¶ 11 , (quoting Hayes v. Cont’l Ins.
- Aileen H. Char Life Interest v. Maricopa County 93 P.3d 486 Ariz. 2004
- Aileen H. Char Life Interest v. Maricopa County 93 P.3d 486 Ariz. 2004
- Pinal Vista Properties, L.L.C. v. Turnbull 91 P.3d 1031 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
- Followed Pinal Vista Properties, L.L.C. v. Turnbull 91 P.3d 1031 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
- Arizona Water Co. v. Arizona Department of Water Resources 91 P.3d 990 Ariz. 2004
- Az Water Co v. Az Dept of Water Resources Ariz. 2004
- Arizona Water Co. v. Arizona Department of Water Resources 91 P.3d 990 Ariz. 2004
- Az Water Co v. Az Dept of Water Resources Ariz. 2004
- State Ex Rel. Department of Revenue v. Capitol Castings, Inc. 88 P.3d 159 Ariz. 2004
-
State Ex Rel. Department of Revenue v. Capitol Castings, Inc.
88 P.3d 159
Ariz. 2004
See Bilke v. State, ___ Ariz. , , ¶ 11, (citing Canon Sch.
- Speros v. Yu 83 P.3d 1094 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
- Speros v. Yu 83 P.3d 1094 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004