Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Stanley v. McCarver, 92 P.3d 849.

64 citing documents.

Ritchie v. Krasner 211 P.3d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Ritchie v. Krasner 211 P.3d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Vasquez v. State 206 P.3d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Vasquez v. State 206 P.3d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
quoting Markowitz, 146 Ariz. at *313 356 , 706 P.2d at 368 ; ¶¶ 10, 12 , 853 (2004); , Wer-theim, , 122 P.3d at 3 ; Bloxham, , 53 P.3d at 199 .
Golob v. ARIZONA MEDICAL BD. OF STATE 176 P.3d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Golob v. ARIZONA MEDICAL BD. OF STATE 176 P.3d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
220 ¶ 2, 223 ¶¶ 12- *511 14, 853 (2004) (finding that a radiologist owed a duty of care to the applicant arising out of the radiologist’s evaluation for pre-employment tuberculosis screening); see also Diggs v. Ariz. Cardiologists, Ltd., , 199 ¶¶ 3, 5, 201 ¶ 14, 203 ¶ 27
Maria Henning v. Montecini Hospitality Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Maria Henning v. Montecini Hospitality Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
¶¶ 25-26; ¶¶ 6, 14, 853 (2004) (finding, when statutes silent on issue, public policy supported recognizing duty of care even absent formal doctor-patient relationship).
Gipson v. Kasey 150 P.3d 228 Ariz. 2007
Gipson v. Kasey 150 P.3d 228 Ariz. 2007
Gipson v. Kasey 129 P.3d 957 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Gipson v. Kasey 129 P.3d 957 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Our supreme court recently explained that when determining “whether a duty exists, courts examine several sources, including the state’s statutes and controlling cases.” ¶ 6
Smethers v. Campion 108 P.3d 946 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Smethers v. Campion 108 P.3d 946 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005