Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., 105 P.3d 1163.

132 citing documents.

State v. Aguilar 178 P.3d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State v. Aguilar 178 P.3d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
But even if it did, our supreme court has stated that “ ‘[e]nactments that are procedural only, and do not alter or affect earlier established substantive rights may be applied retroactively.’ ” City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., , quoting Aranda, , 11 P.3d at 1009 ; see also *33 , 7 P.3d at 96 .
Cundiff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 174 P.3d 270 Ariz. 2008
Cundiff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 174 P.3d 270 Ariz. 2008
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., ¶ 8, (citing Canon School Dist.
McCloud v. State of Arizona Dept. of Public Safety And Kimbro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
McCloud v. State of Arizona Dept. of Public Safety And Kimbro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
See Ardestani v. I.N.S., 502 U.S. 129, 135-36, 112 S. Ct. 515, 520 (1991) (clearly expressed contrary legislative intent rebuts presumption that plain language of statute best indicator of legislative intent); see also City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., (consideration of legislative fact sheets appropriate to determine legislative intent).
Grynberg v. Shaffer 165 P.3d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Grynberg v. Shaffer 165 P.3d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., ¶ 8
Olin Gene Taylor, John Adrian Johnson v. State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Taylor v. Cruikshank 148 P.3d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Taylor v. Cruikshank 148 P.3d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
See City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., , -72 (2005)
Olin Gene Taylor, John Adrian Johnson v. State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
See City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., -72 (2005)
Corbett v. Manorcare of America, Inc. 146 P.3d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Corbett v. Manorcare of America, Inc. 146 P.3d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.
Yarbrough v. Montoya-Paez 147 P.3d 755 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Yarbrough v. Montoya-Paez 147 P.3d 755 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
“Whenever possible, we do not interpret statutes in such a manner as to render a clause superfluous.” City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.
Moreno v. Jones 139 P.3d 612 Ariz. 2006
Moreno v. Jones 139 P.3d 612 Ariz. 2006
City of 11 Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., ¶ 8
Brunet v. Murphy 135 P.3d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Brunet v. Murphy 135 P.3d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., ¶ 71 , (citation omitted).
Roubos v. City of Tucson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Roubos v. City of Tucson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.
4501 NORTHPOINT LP v. Maricopa County 128 P.3d 215 Ariz. 2006
4501 NORTHPOINT LP v. Maricopa County 128 P.3d 215 Ariz. 2006
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., ¶ 8
Pima County v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Pima County v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.
In Re Commitment of Paul Frankovitch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
In Re Commitment of Paul Frankovitch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., P.3d 1163 (2005).
STATE EX REL. DEPT. ECONOMIC SEC. v. Hayden 115 P.3d 116 Ariz. 2005
STATE EX REL. DEPT. ECONOMIC SEC. v. Hayden 115 P.3d 116 Ariz. 2005
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., , 547 ¶ 8
Kent K. v. Bobby M. 110 P.3d 1013 Ariz. 2005
Kent K. v. Bobby M. 110 P.3d 1013 Ariz. 2005
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., 209 Ariz. ___, ___ ¶ 8