Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., 111 P.3d 1003.

44 citing documents.

Stephanie Burkett v. John and Anita Dryja Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Stephanie Burkett v. John and Anita Dryja Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Corp., -76 (1984) (discussing policy differences between tort and contract law in product-liability context), abrogated in part by Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., n.5 (2005).
Yam Capital v. Bailey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Yam Capital v. Bailey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Corp., abrogated on other grounds by Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc.
Qasimyar v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Qasimyar v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., ¶ 17 (2005) (consideration of legislative history “not appropriate” when law is “clear and unambiguous”).
SK Builders, Inc. v. Smith 436 P.3d 519 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
SK Builders, Inc. v. Smith 436 P.3d 519 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
must be strictly confined to rebuttal of points made in the appellee's answering brief."); Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc. , , n.1
Saban v. Ador 418 P.3d 1066 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Saban v. Ador 418 P.3d 1066 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
The pamphlet sent to voters in 1952 did not mention the then-existing car-rental business tax, even while telling voters of other existing taxes that would fall within Section 14's scope: "[S]tate gasoline and diesel taxes, registration fees, unladen weight fees on common 5 Citing Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., Saban argues we may not use the voter pamphlet in interpreting Section 14.
Jeanette M Sanders v. Francis Alger 394 P.3d 1083 Ariz. 2017
Jeanette M Sanders v. Francis Alger 394 P.3d 1083 Ariz. 2017
See Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., ¶ 2, 405 ¶ 11 (2005); see also Ariz. Const. art. 18, § 5; A.R.S.
Jeanette M. Sanders v. Francis Alger 375 P.3d 1199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Jeanette M. Sanders v. Francis Alger 375 P.3d 1199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
1800 Ocotillo, LLC v. WLB Group, Inc., see also Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., ¶¶ 2, 8, 1005 (2005).
Sportway v. Livin Da Dream Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sportway v. Livin Da Dream Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
see also Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., n.1, ¶ 5, n.1 (2005) (stating the court of appeals may properly decline to address an issue raised for the first time in a reply brief).
John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. Laos 326 P.3d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. Laos 326 P.3d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Corp., quoting Arrow Leasing Corp. v. Cummins Ariz. Diesel, Inc., abrogated on other grounds by Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., P.3d 1003 (2005).
Cohen v. Lovitt & Touche, Inc. 308 P.3d 1196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Cohen v. Lovitt & Touche, Inc. 308 P.3d 1196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Corp., abrogated on other grounds by Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., P.3d 1003 (2005).
Adams v. COM'N ON APPELLATE CT. APPOINTMENTS 254 P.3d 367 Ariz. 2011
Adams v. COM'N ON APPELLATE CT. APPOINTMENTS 254 P.3d 367 Ariz. 2011
See Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., -08 ¶¶ 18- 19, -08 (2005) (finding broadly worded constitutional provision did not support narrow construction); ¶ 22, (declining to engraft term not included in statute).
Dooley Corvallas Development Corp. v. O'Brien 244 P.3d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Dooley Corvallas Development Corp. v. O'Brien 244 P.3d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
See Benjamin v. Gear Roller Hockey Equip., Inc., ¶ 23 , (holding a defense based on a contractual waiver and release of liability did not permit the award of attorney’s fees in a negligence action), abrogated on other grounds by Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., -11, ¶ 32 , -11 (2005).
Lee v. State 242 P.3d 175 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Lee v. State 242 P.3d 175 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
[2] See also Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., ¶ 11 , (relying on Article 18, Section 5, of the Arizona Constitution to conclude that a jury must decide if the affirmative defense of assumption of the risk precludes a plaintiff from recovering damages); -13
ELM RETIREMENT CENTER, LP v. Callaway 246 P.3d 938 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
ELM RETIREMENT CENTER, LP v. Callaway 246 P.3d 938 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Corp., , (upholding warranty disclaimer in commercial sales case), abrogated on other grounds by Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., , S Dev.
Arizona City Sanitary Dist. v. Pinal County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Arizona City Sanitary Dist. v. Pinal County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
See Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., ¶¶ 39-40
Flagstaff Affordable Housing Ltd. Partnership v. Design Alliance, Inc. 223 P.3d 664 Ariz. 2010
Flagstaff Affordable Housing Ltd. Partnership v. Design Alliance, Inc. 223 P.3d 664 Ariz. 2010
Compare Apollo 1 We subsequently abrogated Salt River to the extent it suggested that courts may grant summary judgment to a defendant who asserts an assumption of risk defense, see Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., -11 n.5, -11 n.5 (2005), an issue unrelated to the economic loss doctrine.
HUGHES CUSTOM BLDG, LLC v. Davey 212 P.3d 865 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
HUGHES CUSTOM BLDG, LLC v. Davey 212 P.3d 865 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Corp., -79 , -09 (1984), abrogated on other grounds by Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., , Carstens, , 75 P.3d at 1083-84 .
FLAGSTAFF AFFORDABLE HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. Design Alliance Inc. 212 P.3d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
FLAGSTAFF AFFORDABLE HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. Design Alliance Inc. 212 P.3d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Corp., , (barring strict liability action in products liability context when only economic loss occurs), abrogated on other grounds by Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., , Woodward v. Chino Const. Co., Inc., , (barring negligence claim for pure economic losses in construction defect context); Carstens, , , (same); Nastri v. Woo
Valley Forge Insurance Co. v. Sam's Plumbing Thomas, Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Valley Forge Insurance Co. v. Sam's Plumbing Thomas, Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Corp., abrogated on other grounds by Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., P.3d 1003 (2005); Woodward v. Chirco Constr.
1800 OCOTILLO, LLC v. WLB Group, Inc. 196 P.3d 222 Ariz. 2008
1800 OCOTILLO, LLC v. WLB Group, Inc. 196 P.3d 222 Ariz. 2008
¶ 14, (observing that the doctrine of assumption of risk has been used by courts in several different senses).
1800 OCOTILLO, LLC v. WLB Group, Inc. 176 P.3d 33 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
1800 OCOTILLO, LLC v. WLB Group, Inc. 176 P.3d 33 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Corp., , (“SRP v. Westinghouse ”) (reversing summary judgment in products liability action as fact issues existed regarding enforceability of limitation-of-liability provision), abrogated on other grounds by Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., , , -08 (App.1977) (upholding a provision limiting liability for alarm company negligence to a sum equal to six months of rental service).
Sonoran Desert Investigations, Inc. v. Miller 141 P.3d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Sonoran Desert Investigations, Inc. v. Miller 141 P.3d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
at a statute may not provide that “the antecedent conduct of a person injured is an absolute bar to the recovery of damages from one *278 otherwise liable for the injury under either statutory or common law principles.” -02 , -22 (1990); see also Schwab, 164 Ariz. at 424-25, 793 P.2d at 1091-92 ; cf. Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., , (issue of express contractual assumption of risk cannot be removed from jury; article XVIII, § 5 subject to “expansive reading” on assumption of risk).