Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Safeway Ins. Co., Inc. v. Guerrero, 106 P.3d 1020.

51 citing documents.

Knight v. Elias Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Knight v. Elias Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Co., –15 ¶¶ 32–33, 35 (2005) (describing existing “deterrence to lawyer misbehavior,” including “severe jeopardy” for deceit in litigation under civil procedure and ethical rules); Norwest Bank, N.A.
Centerpoint v. Commonwealth Ariz. 2025
Centerpoint v. Commonwealth Ariz. 2025
Cravens v. Montano 567 P.3d 745 Ariz. 2025
Cravens v. Montano 567 P.3d 745 Ariz. 2025
Flores v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Flores v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Co., 758 F.2d 409, 414-15 (9th Cir. 1985) (abuse of process); Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP, ¶ 9 (App. 2017) (breach of fiduciary duty); Rowland v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 210 Ariz. 5 FLORES v. JOHNSON Decision of the Court 530, 532, ¶ 6 (App. 2005) (negligence); (IIED).
Centerpoint v. Fidelity Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Centerpoint v. Fidelity Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 1 n.1 (2005) (citing United Servs.
Powers Steel v. Vinton Steel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Powers Steel v. Vinton Steel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Aspen v. Wakefield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Aspen v. Wakefield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
v. Guerrero, ¶ 14 (2005).
Synergy v. Singh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Synergy v. Singh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Apollo Education v. National Union Fire Insurance Ariz. 2021
Apollo Education v. National Union Fire Insurance Ariz. 2021
¶ 11 (2005); see also Ariz. Prop.
Antseliovich v. US Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Antseliovich v. US Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Singh v. Malhotra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Singh v. Malhotra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Co., Miller v. Hehlen, 209 Ariz. at 471, ¶ 32 (quoting Wallace v. Casa Grande Union High Sch.
Camelback v. Cbre Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Camelback v. Cbre Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Joshua W. v. Dcs, F.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
ABCDW LLC v. Banning 388 P.3d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
ABCDW LLC v. Banning 388 P.3d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Pedco v. Under the Tent Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Pedco v. Under the Tent Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mortensen v. Gust Rosenfeld Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Mortensen v. Gust Rosenfeld Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
v. Guerrero, –12, ¶ 21 (2005).
Fidelity National Title Insurance v. Centerpoint Mechanic Lien Claims, LLC 357 P.3d 170 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Fidelity National Title Insurance v. Centerpoint Mechanic Lien Claims, LLC 357 P.3d 170 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Hendershott v. Babeu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Hendershott v. Babeu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Midtown v. Farmers 334 P.3d 1252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Midtown v. Farmers 334 P.3d 1252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Leflet v. Redwood Fire & Casualty Insurance 247 P.3d 180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Leflet v. Redwood Fire & Casualty Insurance 247 P.3d 180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
(internal citation and quotation marks omitted).
McReynolds v. American Commerce Insurance 235 P.3d 278 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
McReynolds v. American Commerce Insurance 235 P.3d 278 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
¶ 11 , (“The insurer owes the insured an implied contractual ‘duty to treat settlement proposals with equal consideration’ to its interests and those of an insured.”) (quoting Ariz. Prop.
Penn-America Insurance v. Sanchez 202 P.3d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Penn-America Insurance v. Sanchez 202 P.3d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
7 n. 1, ¶ 1, , 1022 n. 1 (2005) (discussing differences between Morris and Damron agreements).
Chalpin v. Snyder 207 P.3d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Chalpin v. Snyder 207 P.3d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
¶ 15 , , (rejecting argument that attorney’s acts were “privileged, unless he has engaged in malicious prosecution or abuse of process”), aff'd in part and vacated in pari on other grounds, , 728
Webb v. Gittlen 174 P.3d 275 Ariz. 2008
Webb v. Gittlen 174 P.3d 275 Ariz. 2008
¶ 1 n.1, n.1 (2005) (discussing differences between Morris and Damron agreements).
Neonatology Associates, Ltd. v. Phoenix Perinatal Associates Inc. 164 P.3d 691 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Neonatology Associates, Ltd. v. Phoenix Perinatal Associates Inc. 164 P.3d 691 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
11 ¶ 20, (citation omitted); see Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Mem’l Hosp., , (superseded by statute not relevant to this ease).
Fillmore v. MARICOPA WATER PROCESSING 120 P.3d 697 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005