Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Kent K. v. Bobby M., 110 P.3d 1013.
-
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to K.B.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 41 (2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to K.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to K.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Henke v. Hospital Ariz. 2025
-
Henke v. Hospital
Ariz. 2025
“The preponderance of the evidence standard requires that the fact-finder determine whether a fact sought to be proved is more probable than not.” ¶ 25 (2005).
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.C.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
at 150 ¶ 12 ( ¶ 31 (2005)).
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to M.L. and Y.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Term of Parental Rights as to K.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Term of Parental Rights as to K.D.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Decision of the Court and that termination is in the child’s best interests by a preponderance of the evidence, ¶ 22 (2005).
-
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to M.L. and Y.L.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
§ 8-533(B); ¶ 22 (2005).
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to I.C. and L.R Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to I.C. and L.R Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Flaigan v. Kittelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Flaigan v. Kittelson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
258 Ariz. at 553, ¶ 38 (Catlett, J., concurring); -85, ¶ 25 (2005) (The clear and convincing evidence standard requires “the thing to be proved is highly probable or reasonably certain.” (quotation omitted)).
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to L.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to L.H.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
§ 8-533(B); ¶ 22 (2005).
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to M.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to M.S.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000); ¶ 41 (2005).
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to M.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
-
In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to M.P.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
¶10 “Parents possess a fundamental liberty interest in the care, custody, and management of their children.” Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65 (2000) (describing interest of parents in care, custody, and control of their children as oldest of fundamental liberty interests).
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to L.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to L.B.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
§ 8-533(B); ¶ 22 (2005).
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.R. and B.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.R. and B.R.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
and A.R., the court was required to “presume” that Father’s interests and those of the children “diverge,” ¶ 35 (2005), and could not properly “subordinate the interests of [the children] to those of the parent,” see Alma S., 245 Ariz. at 151, ¶ 15.
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to T.A. and J.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to K.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to S.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to S.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to T.A. and J.A.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and by a preponderance of the evidence that termination is in the best interests of the child, ¶ 41 (2005).
-
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to K.C.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and by a preponderance of the evidence that termination is in the best interests of the child, ¶ 41 (2005).
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to K.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to K.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to D.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to D.H.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
§ 8-537(B); ¶ 22 (2005).
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to R.E. and M.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.P.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 41 (2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to R.E. and M.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to K.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to K.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.S. and A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.R. and J.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.S. and A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.R. and J.R.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶21 “At the best-interests stage of the analysis, ‘we can presume that the interests of the parent and child diverge because the court has already found the existence of one of the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.’” Alma S. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 12 (2018) ( ¶ 35 (2005)).
- Whiter v. hilton/procaccianti Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Whiter v. hilton/procaccianti
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Clear and convincing evidence is a “heightened standard of proof [] indicat[ing] that the thing to be proved is highly probable or reasonably certain.” –85, ¶ 25 (2005) (cleaned up).
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025