Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Kent K. v. Bobby M., 110 P.3d 1013.
- Catherine B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- David C., Kim C. v. Alexis S., A.C. 358 P.3d 595 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- David C., Kim C. v. Alexis S., A.C. 358 P.3d 595 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Bethany C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Bethany C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Lester L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Lester L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- E.O. v. Michael M., Katie A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- E.O. v. Michael M., Katie A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Demetrius L. v. Hoshlynn F., D.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Angelique B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Demetrius L. v. Hoshlynn F., D.L.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
When making a best interests determination, a juvenile court must balance the “unfit” parent’s rights against the child’ ¶ 37 (2005).
- Angelique B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Rosabelle P., Artem D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Rosabelle P., Artem D. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
A juvenile court must find, by a preponderance of the evidence, ¶ 42, that termination of parental rights is in the child’s best interests; specifically, how the child “would benefit from a severance or be harmed by the continuation of the relationship.” Maricopa Cnty.
- Mary B., Christopher W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Mary B., Christopher W. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 41 (2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
- Amanda W. v. Donovan F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Amanda W. v. Donovan F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Andrew B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Guy N. v. Dcs, B.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Guy N. v. Dcs, B.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Andrew B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Jason H. v. Dcs, A.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Manuel W. v. Dcs, M.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Jessica H. v. Dcs, X.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Manuel W. v. Dcs, M.W.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
§§ 8-533(B), -537(B); ¶ 41 (2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
- Jessica H. v. Dcs, X.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Jason H. v. Dcs, A.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Cherlle S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Cherlle S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Heather D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Heather D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Jerry P. v. Dcs, A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Jerry P. v. Dcs, A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Kimberly H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Kimberly H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Dania E. v. Dcs, C.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Dania E. v. Dcs, C.M.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 42, Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
- Andrew R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Andrew R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Alice M. v. Department of Child Safety 345 P.3d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Alice M. v. Department of Child Safety
345 P.3d 125
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Action No. JS-501568, , (noting the State’s interest in protecting children); ¶ 24 , (observing that “parental rights are not absolute”).
- Ashlyn H. v. Dcs, A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Ashlyn H. v. Dcs, A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Robert D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Robert D. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
5 ¶9 Substantial evidence supports the termination order under A.R.S.
- Paige S. v. Dcs, G.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Paige S. v. Dcs, G.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Diana R. v. Dcs, I.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014