Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Kent K. v. Bobby M., 110 P.3d 1013.
- Vanetta H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Vanetta H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Jon D., Kristie W. v. Dcs, C.W.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
§ 8-533(B); ¶ 22 (2005).
- Kemp v. Kemp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Kemp v. Kemp
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 14, 3 I. Appellate Jurisdiction ¶10 As an initial matter, Kevin suggests we lack jurisdiction of the appeal because Terri did not file an amended notice of appeal from the October 16, 2014 final judgment.
- Ashlee W. v. Dcs, E.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Ashlee W. v. Dcs, E.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Tamarra P. v. Dcs, M.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Tamarra P. v. Dcs, M.B.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 41 (2005); 4 TAMARRA P. v. DCS, M.B.
- Jonathan L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Jonathan L. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
§ 8–533(B) (Supp. 2014); ¶ 22
- Catherine B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Catherine B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- David C., Kim C. v. Alexis S., A.C. 358 P.3d 595 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- David C., Kim C. v. Alexis S., A.C. 358 P.3d 595 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Bethany C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Bethany C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Lester L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Lester L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- E.O. v. Michael M., Katie A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- E.O. v. Michael M., Katie A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Demetrius L. v. Hoshlynn F., D.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Angelique B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Demetrius L. v. Hoshlynn F., D.L.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
When making a best interests determination, a juvenile court must balance the “unfit” parent’s rights against the child’ ¶ 37 (2005).
- Angelique B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Rosabelle P., Artem D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Rosabelle P., Artem D. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
A juvenile court must find, by a preponderance of the evidence, ¶ 42, that termination of parental rights is in the child’s best interests; specifically, how the child “would benefit from a severance or be harmed by the continuation of the relationship.” Maricopa Cnty.
- Mary B., Christopher W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Mary B., Christopher W. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 41 (2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
- Amanda W. v. Donovan F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Amanda W. v. Donovan F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Andrew B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Guy N. v. Dcs, B.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Guy N. v. Dcs, B.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Andrew B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Jason H. v. Dcs, A.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Manuel W. v. Dcs, M.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Jessica H. v. Dcs, X.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Manuel W. v. Dcs, M.W.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
§§ 8-533(B), -537(B); ¶ 41 (2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
- Jessica H. v. Dcs, X.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Jason H. v. Dcs, A.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Cherlle S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Cherlle S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Heather D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Heather D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Jerry P. v. Dcs, A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Jerry P. v. Dcs, A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Kimberly H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Kimberly H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Dania E. v. Dcs, C.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015