Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Dressler v. Morrison, 130 P.3d 978.
-
Cullen v. Koty-Leavitt Insurance Agency, Inc.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
In Mohave Disposal, our supreme court stated it would “uphold dismissal [for failure to state a claim] only if the plaintiffs would not be entitled to relief under any facts susceptible of proof in the statement of the claim.” (Emphasis added); (quoting Mohave Disposal).
- Myers Ex Rel. Myers v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. 170 P.3d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
- Myers Ex Rel. Myers v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. 170 P.3d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
- Airfreight Express, Ltd. v. Evergreen Air Center, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
- Airfreight Express, Ltd. v. Evergreen Air Center, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
- COHEN v. FREY, Fka COHEN Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
-
COHEN v. FREY, Fka COHEN
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
We review a trial court’s order dismissing a claim for an abuse of discretion, upholding the order “‘only if the plaintiff[] would not be entitled to relief under any facts susceptible of proof in the statement of the claim.’” quoting Mohave Disposal, Inc. v. City of Kingman, 186 Ariz. 343, 346
- Gorney v. Meaney Rincon Orthopedic Associates, P.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
- Gorney v. Meaney Rincon Orthopedic Associates, P.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
- Mejak v. Granville 136 P.3d 874 Ariz. 2006
-
Mejak v. Granville
136 P.3d 874
Ariz. 2006
Dressler v. Morrison, ____ Ariz. ____, ¶ 11, (citing State ex rel.