Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Granville, 123 P.3d 662.

98 citing documents.

State v. Benson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Benson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State of Arizona v. Stephen Douglas Reeves 310 P.3d 970 Ariz. 2013
State of Arizona v. Stephen Douglas Reeves 310 P.3d 970 Ariz. 2013
Thomas v. Granville (Baldwin), ¶ 21, ).
State of Arizona v. Jesus Xavier Almaguer 303 P.3d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Jesus Xavier Almaguer 303 P.3d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
(jury instructions as whole must provide information necessary for jury to arrive at legally correct decision); see also McKeon, 38 P.3d at 1242.
State of Arizona v. Dale Shawn Hausner 280 P.3d 604 Ariz. 2012
State of Arizona v. Dale Shawn Hausner 280 P.3d 604 Ariz. 2012
Thomas v. Granville (Baldwin), ¶ 18
State v. Prince 250 P.3d 1145 Ariz. 2011
State v. Prince 250 P.3d 1145 Ariz. 2011
Thomas v. Granville (Baldwin), ¶ 17
State of Arizona v. Douglas Lee Eddington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State of Arizona v. Douglas Lee Eddington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
we find that it correctly stated the law, even though the fourth enumerated point was unnecessary and arguably inadvisable.
State v. Gallardo 242 P.3d 159 Ariz. 2010
State v. Gallardo 242 P.3d 159 Ariz. 2010
Thomas v. Granville (Baldwin), ¶ 18
State v. KUHS 224 P.3d 192 Ariz. 2010
State v. KUHS 224 P.3d 192 Ariz. 2010
State v. Speer 212 P.3d 787 Ariz. 2009
State v. Moore 213 P.3d 150 Ariz. 2009
State v. Moore 213 P.3d 150 Ariz. 2009
Thomas v. Granville (Baldwin), ¶ 17
State v. Speer 212 P.3d 787 Ariz. 2009
Thomas v. Granville (Baldwin), ¶ 21
State v. Dann 207 P.3d 604 Ariz. 2009
State v. Dann 207 P.3d 604 Ariz. 2009
Thomas v. Granville (Baldwin), ¶ 8
State of Arizona v. Armando Galaviz Fierro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State of Arizona v. Armando Galaviz Fierro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State v. Bocharski 189 P.3d 403 Ariz. 2008
State v. Bocharski 189 P.3d 403 Ariz. 2008
Thomas v. Granville (Baldwin), ¶ 8
State v. Martinez 189 P.3d 348 Ariz. 2008
State v. Martinez 189 P.3d 348 Ariz. 2008
Thomas v. Granville (Baldwin), P.3d 662 (2005).13 ¶55 Baldwin rejected the state’s contention that a jury should be instructed that the defendant bore the burden of proving that the mitigation was substantial enough to call for leniency, finding that neither the state nor the defendant has such a burden
State v. Cruz 181 P.3d 196 Ariz. 2008
State v. Cruz 181 P.3d 196 Ariz. 2008
Thomas v. Granville (Baldwin), which held that no presumption of death arises when an aggravating circumstance is found because a jury may sentence a death-eligible defendant to life in prison “even if the defendant decides to present no mitigation evidence at all.” ¶ 12
State v. Harrod 183 P.3d 519 Ariz. 2008
State v. Harrod 183 P.3d 519 Ariz. 2008
Thomas v. Granville (Baldwin), P.3d 662 (2005).
State v. Barraza 170 P.3d 293 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Velazquez 166 P.3d 91 Ariz. 2007
State v. Velazquez 166 P.3d 91 Ariz. 2007
Thomas v. Granville (Baldwin), 211 Ariz. 468, narrow the grounds on which a potential juror may be excused for cause.
State v. Pandeli 161 P.3d 557 Ariz. 2007
State v. Pandeli 161 P.3d 557 Ariz. 2007
Thomas v. Granville (Baldwin), ¶ 8
State v. Andriano 161 P.3d 540 Ariz. 2007
State v. Andriano 161 P.3d 540 Ariz. 2007
Thomas v. Granville (Baldwin), ¶ 8
State v. Garza 163 P.3d 1006 Ariz. 2007
State v. Garza 163 P.3d 1006 Ariz. 2007
Thomas v. Granville (Baldwin), ¶ 17, (noting that “neither party bears the burden” of persuasion in the penalty phase).
State v. Tucker 160 P.3d 177 Ariz. 2007
State v. Tucker 160 P.3d 177 Ariz. 2007
Thomas v. Granville (Baldwin), ¶ 21
State v. Roque 141 P.3d 368 Ariz. 2006
State v. Roque 141 P.3d 368 Ariz. 2006
State v. Ellison 140 P.3d 899 Ariz. 2006
State v. Ellison 140 P.3d 899 Ariz. 2006
-72 ¶¶ 12-13, - 66 (2005).
State v. Grell 135 P.3d 696 Ariz. 2006

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by