Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Powell v. Washburn, 125 P.3d 373.

75 citing documents.

cheatham/huey v. Diciccio/phoenix Law Enforcement Association 379 P.3d 211 Ariz. 2016
cheatham/huey v. Diciccio/phoenix Law Enforcement Association 379 P.3d 211 Ariz. 2016
555 ¶ 8, (noting that contractual interpretation generally is a matter of law).
Comanche v. Pollard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Book Ctrs., Inc. v. Carefree Foothills Homeowners’ Ass’n, ¶ 11 (App. 2010) (-56, ¶ 8 (2006)).
Pinnacle Peak v. Ramioulle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Pinnacle Peak v. Ramioulle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶8 ¶ 1, 556-57, ¶ 13 (2006), the Arizona Supreme Court adopted the Restatement (Third) of Property approach for interpreting restrictive covenants, which requires giving "effect to the intention of the parties ascertained from the language used in the instrument, or the circumstances surrounding creation of the ser
Soverign v. Integrated Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Soverign v. Integrated Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Anderson v. Prescott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Anderson v. Prescott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Ass’n, ¶ 17, P.3d 373 (2006).
CYPRESS ON SUNLAND HOMEOWNERS, ASS'N. v. Orlandini 257 P.3d 1168 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
CYPRESS ON SUNLAND HOMEOWNERS, ASS'N. v. Orlandini 257 P.3d 1168 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
¶ 16 , (citation omitted).
Freeman v. Sorchych 245 P.3d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Freeman v. Sorchych 245 P.3d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
College Book Centers, Inc. v. Carefree Foothills Homeowners' Ass'n 241 P.3d 897 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
College Book Centers, Inc. v. Carefree Foothills Homeowners' Ass'n 241 P.3d 897 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Saguaro Highlands Community Ass'n v. Biltis 229 P.3d 1036 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Saguaro Highlands Community Ass'n v. Biltis 229 P.3d 1036 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
King v. Titsworth 212 P.3d 935 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
King v. Titsworth 212 P.3d 935 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
§ 12-341.01 because it requested attorneys’ fees for the first time in its supplemental brief); ¶ 29 , (denying the appellee’s claim for attorneys’ fees because he made the request in his supplemental brief, not in his petition for review).
First American Title Insurance v. Action Acquisitions, LLC 187 P.3d 1107 Ariz. 2008
First American Title Insurance v. Action Acquisitions, LLC 187 P.3d 1107 Ariz. 2008
Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass'n v. Kitchukov 165 P.3d 173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass'n v. Kitchukov 165 P.3d 173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
William Roubos v. Hon. Leslie miller/tucson 153 P.3d 1045 Ariz. 2007
William Roubos v. Hon. Leslie miller/tucson 153 P.3d 1045 Ariz. 2007