DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Estate of Winn v. Plaza Healthcare, Inc., 150 P.3d 236.

64 citing documents.

  • Ballesteros v. American Standard Insurance 222 P.3d 292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
  • Ballesteros v. American Standard Insurance 222 P.3d 292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
    ¶ 10 “Our primary task in interpreting statutes is to give effect to the intent of the legislature.” In re Estate of Winn, *274
  • Minjares v. State 219 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • State v. Haney 219 P.3d 274 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • Minjares v. State 219 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • State v. Haney 219 P.3d 274 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
    To determine the legislative intent, we must examine the words of the statute, “the policies] behind the statute[ ] and the evil[s] [it was] designed to remedy.” ¶ 8 , (quoting Calvert v. Farmers Ins.
  • In Re Estate of Wyttenbach 193 P.3d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
  • In Re Estate of Wyttenbach 193 P.3d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
    Nona cited this court’s decision in In re Estate of Winn (Winn I), ¶ 24 , rev’d, , which held that a late-appointed personal representative was precluded from pursuing claims based on the APSA.
  • Mathews v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc. 177 P.3d 867 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
  • Mathews v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc. 177 P.3d 867 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
    ¶ 16 Most recently, in In re Estate of Mary Winn v. Plaza Healthcare, Inc., ¶ 15 , the supreme court held that “limitations placed on personal representatives by the probate code do not restrict APSA claims.” In Estate of Mary Winn, almost five years after Mary’s death, her husband brought an APSA claim against Plaza Healthcare alleging that Plaza abused or neg
  • In Re Estate of Friedman 177 P.3d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
  • In Re Estate of Friedman 177 P.3d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
    ¶¶ 13-15 , (holding that the APSA is to be interpreted broadly to effectuate its remedial purpose and a late-appointed personal representative can pursue an elder abuse claim on behalf of the estate in spite of limitations placed on personal representative in the probate code); Estate of
  • City of Chandler v. Arizona Department of Transportation 167 P.3d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
  • City of Chandler v. Arizona Department of Transportation 167 P.3d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
    ¶ 8 , Haas v. Colosi ¶ 6