Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Falcon Ex Rel. Sandoval v. Maricopa County, 144 P.3d 1254.

92 citing documents.

McCcd v. Hon talamante/arvizu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 9, (-36, ¶ 19, -16 (App. 2004)); -29, ¶ 11, -45 (App. 2008).
Austin v. Peoria Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Austin v. Peoria Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Iknadosian v. Mahon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Iknadosian v. Mahon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Patterson v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Patterson v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Drew v. Prescott Unified School District 314 P.3d 1277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Drew v. Prescott Unified School District 314 P.3d 1277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
¶ 9 , (-36, ¶ 19 , -16 (App.2004)); Yollin, 219 Ariz. at 28-29, ¶ 11 , 191 P.3d at 1044-45 .
Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. Partnership 279 P.3d 1191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. Partnership 279 P.3d 1191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
¶ 10 , in support of its argument.
Canyon Del Rio Investors, L.L.C. v. City of Flagstaff 258 P.3d 154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Canyon Del Rio Investors, L.L.C. v. City of Flagstaff 258 P.3d 154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Slaughter v. Maricopa County 258 P.3d 141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Slaughter v. Maricopa County 258 P.3d 141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
¶ 10 , -88, ¶ 7 , -28 (App.2005).
Turner v. City of Flagstaff 247 P.3d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Turner v. City of Flagstaff 247 P.3d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Little v. State 240 P.3d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Little v. State 240 P.3d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Simon v. MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTER 234 P.3d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Simon v. MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTER 234 P.3d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Batty v. Glendale Union High School District No. 205 212 P.3d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Followed Batty v. Glendale Union High School District No. 205 212 P.3d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
and hold that, in this case, delivery of a notice of claim to the school superintendent is insufficient to complete service of process on the District.
Beynon v. TREZZA 211 P.3d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Beynon v. TREZZA 211 P.3d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
(“Actual *224 notice and substantial compliance do not excuse failure to comply with the statutory requirements of A.R.S.
Backus v. State 203 P.3d 499 Ariz. 2009
Backus v. State 203 P.3d 499 Ariz. 2009
City of Phoenix v. Fields 199 P.3d 1220 Ariz. 2009
City of Phoenix v. Fields 199 P.3d 1220 Ariz. 2009
Havasupai Tribe of the Havasupai Reservation v. Arizona Board of Regents 204 P.3d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Havasupai Tribe of the Havasupai Reservation v. Arizona Board of Regents 204 P.3d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
¶10 , (“Actual notice and substantial compliance do not excuse failure to comply with the statutory requirements of A.R.S.
Vasquez v. State 206 P.3d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Vasquez v. State 206 P.3d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
James Colt Jones v. Cochise County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
James Colt Jones v. Cochise County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Sandoval v. Maricopa County, 213 Ariz. 525, ¶ 9
Haab v. County of Maricopa 191 P.3d 1025 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Haab v. County of Maricopa 191 P.3d 1025 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Lee v. State 182 P.3d 1169 Ariz. 2008
Harris, Wilson, Angel Team Home Care v. Cochise Health Systems Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Harris, Wilson, Angel Team Home Care v. Cochise Health Systems Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. Houser 152 P.3d 490 Ariz. 2007
Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. Houser 152 P.3d 490 Ariz. 2007
¶ 9, (quoting Martineau v. Maricopa County, 207 Ariz. 332, 335-36 ¶ 19, -16 (App. 2004)).