Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. Houser, 152 P.3d 490.

175 citing documents.

Drew v. Prescott Unified School District 314 P.3d 1277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Disk No. 97 v. Houser, ¶ 9 , (requiring that a claimant “include a particular and certain amount of money that, if agreed to by the government entity, will settle the claim”).
State v. Doty 307 P.3d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Doty 307 P.3d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
No. 97 v. Houser, ¶ 8 , ).
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. White 295 P.3d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. White 295 P.3d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
No. 97 v. Houser, ¶ 8 , (quoting Janson ex rel.
Powers v. GUARANTY RV, INC. 278 P.3d 333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Powers v. GUARANTY RV, INC. 278 P.3d 333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. Partnership 279 P.3d 1191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. Partnership 279 P.3d 1191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
v. Houser (McDonald), ¶ 23 , , 496 (2007), and Falcon ex rel.
Bt Capital, LLC v. Td Service Co. 265 P.3d 370 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Bt Capital, LLC v. Td Service Co. 265 P.3d 370 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State Ex Rel. Horne v. Autozone, Inc. 258 P.3d 289 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State Ex Rel. Horne v. Autozone, Inc. 258 P.3d 289 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
No. 97 v. Houser, ¶ 8 , (quoting Janson ex rel.
Turner v. City of Flagstaff 247 P.3d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Turner v. City of Flagstaff 247 P.3d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
In Re BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF $75,000 238 P.3d 1275 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
In Re BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF $75,000 238 P.3d 1275 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
No. 97 v. Houser, quoting Janson ex rel.
Simon v. MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTER 234 P.3d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Simon v. MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTER 234 P.3d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
-99, ¶¶ 19-21 , , 495-96 (2007) rejected the substantial compliance standard in Hollingsworth.
County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co. 233 P.3d 1169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co. 233 P.3d 1169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In Re Mh 2008-002659 226 P.3d 394 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In Re Mh 2008-002659 226 P.3d 394 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
No. 97 v. Houser, ¶ 8 , ( , ).
Rogers v. Cota 219 P.3d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Rogers v. Cota 219 P.3d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
No. 97 v. Houser, ¶ 8 , ).
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Duncan 216 P.3d 1194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Duncan 216 P.3d 1194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
No. 97 v. Houser, ¶ 8 , ).
State of Arizona v. Payne Nelson Daniels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
State v. Payne 225 P.3d 1131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
State v. Payne 225 P.3d 1131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
No. 97 v. Houser, , (courts interpret statutes so no part will be redundant).
State of Arizona v. Payne Nelson Daniels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
No. 97 v. Houser, (courts interpret statutes so no part will be redundant).
COUNTY OF COCHISE v. SEBASTIAO FARIA and MARIA FARI Dba FARIA DAIRY Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
COUNTY OF COCHISE v. SEBASTIAO FARIA and MARIA FARI Dba FARIA DAIRY Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
No. 97 v. Houser, (courts interpret statutes so no part will be redundant).
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Newell 210 P.3d 1283 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Newell 210 P.3d 1283 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
No. 07 v. Houser, ¶ 8 , ).
Beynon v. TREZZA 211 P.3d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Beynon v. TREZZA 211 P.3d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
¶ 8 In late February 2007, the Arizona Supreme Court issued its opinion in Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. Houser
Backus v. State 203 P.3d 499 Ariz. 2009
Backus v. State 203 P.3d 499 Ariz. 2009
No. 97 v. Houser, ¶ 6, (quoting Falcon ex rel.
City of Phoenix v. Johnson 204 P.3d 447 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
City of Phoenix v. Johnson 204 P.3d 447 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
No. 97 v. Houser, ¶ 8 , (quoting Janson ex rel.
City of Phoenix v. Fields 199 P.3d 1220 Ariz. 2009
City of Phoenix v. Fields 199 P.3d 1220 Ariz. 2009
Patterson v. Mahoney 199 P.3d 708 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Patterson v. Mahoney 199 P.3d 708 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
No. 97 v. Houser, ¶ 8 , ).
Backus v. State 204 P.3d 399 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Backus v. State 204 P.3d 399 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
On February 26, 2007, the Arizona Supreme Court’s opinion in Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. Houser, , was published, and on March 6, 2007, the State filed a motion to dismiss on the basis that “the [n]otice of [c]laim fail[ed] to comply with A.R.S.
Havasupai Tribe of the Havasupai Reservation v. Arizona Board of Regents 204 P.3d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Havasupai Tribe of the Havasupai Reservation v. Arizona Board of Regents 204 P.3d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
¶ 20 After briefing was complete on ABOR’s motion but before the court issued its ruling, our supreme court decided Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. Houser
Vasquez v. State 206 P.3d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008