Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Rayes, 153 P.3d 1040.

126 citing documents.

State v. Melendez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Melendez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶11 "The Sixth Amendment guarantee of right to counsel entitles a defendant to 'effective assistance of counsel.'" ¶ 10 (2007) (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 (1984)).
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Salinas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Salinas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 20 (2007); ¶ 9 (2002).
State v. Colorado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Colorado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Farr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Farr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 20 (2007); Ariz. R. Crim.
State v. Stroble Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Stroble Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Wayment Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Wayment Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Ballesteros Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Ballesteros Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Vasquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Vasquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 20, (“[D]efendant may bring ineffective assistance of counsel claims only in a Rule 32 post-conviction proceeding—not before trial, at trial, or on direct review.”).
State v. Brooks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Brooks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Lieser Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Lieser Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Esposito Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Esposito Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Arvizu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Arvizu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(stating “a defendant may bring ineffective assistance of counsel claims only in a Rule 32 post-conviction proceeding — not .
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 20 (2007); State v. Spreitz, 3 Defendant’s prior historical felony conviction occurred within the ten years immediately preceding the date of this offense.
State of Arizona v. Phillip Gregory Speers 361 P.3d 952 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Phillip Gregory Speers 361 P.3d 952 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
(defendant may bring ineffective assistance claims “only in a 6 STATE v. SPEERS Opinion of the Court Rule 32 post-conviction proceeding—not before trial, at trial, or on direct review”).
State v. Gabriel-Gabriel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Gabriel-Gabriel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Thompson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Thompson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Black Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Gorman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Gorman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(noting that “a defendant may bring ineffective assistance of counsel claims only in a Rule 32 post- conviction proceeding—not before trial, at trial, or on direct review”).
State v. Black Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Guinard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Guinard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 20, (“[D]efendant may bring ineffective assistance of counsel claims only in a Rule 32 post-conviction proceeding—not before trial, at trial, or on direct review.”).
State v. Leker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Leker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 20, (noting that “a defendant may bring ineffective assistance of counsel claims only in a Rule 32 post-conviction proceeding—not before trial, at trial, or on direct review”).
State v. Wilenchik Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Wilenchik Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Russell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Russell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
414, ¶¶ 2-3, 16-20, 1044 (2007).
State v. Ashmeade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Ashmeade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 20, (“defendant may bring ineffective assistance of counsel claims only in a Rule 32 post-conviction proceeding—not before trial, at trial, or on direct review”).
State v. Rivera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Rivera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015