Cited by

Co., ¶ 14 (2008), nor should courts accept as true conclusions of law, inferences, or deductions that are not necessarily implied by well-pled facts or that are unreasonable, or legal conclusions alleged as facts, ¶ 4 (App. 2005) (citations omitted).

Co., (on Rule 12(b)(6) motion, “Arizona courts look only to the pleading itself” and must “assume the truth of the well-pled factual allegations and indulge all reasonable inferences therefrom”) with Workman v. Verde Wellness Ctr., Inc., (summary judgment appropriate when only on

Co., ¶ 4 (2008) (citation omitted).

Co., ¶ 6 (2008) (citation omitted); Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 8.

Co., ¶ 7 (2008) (“Courts must .

Co., ¶ 7 (2008), and will affirm only if, as a matter of law, Appellants “would not be entitled to relief under any interpretation of the facts[,]” Coleman, 230 Ariz. at 356, ¶ 8 (quoting Fid.

Co., ¶ 7 (2008), and will affirm only if, as a matter of law, the Appellants “would not be entitled to relief under any interpretation of the facts,” Coleman, 230 Ariz. at 356, ¶ 8 (quotation and citation omitted).

Co., ¶ 7 (2008), and will affirm only if, as a matter of law, the petitioner “would not be entitled to relief under any interpretation of the facts,” ¶ 8 (2012) (quotation and citation omitted).

Co., ¶ 14 (2008) (citation omitted), nor should courts “accept as true allegations consisting of conclusions of law, inferences or deductions that are not necessarily implied by well-pleaded facts, unreasonable inferences or unsupported conclusions from such facts, or legal conclusions alleged as facts,” Jeter v. May

Co., ¶ 7 (2008) (citations omitted).

Co., ¶ 6 (2008) (reaffirming the notice pleading standard for civil complaints); (reiterating our long-standing preference to decide cases on the merits).

Co., ¶ 6 (2008) (citation and quotation marks omitted).

Co., ¶ 6 (2008); Ariz. R. Civ.