Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Estate of braden/gabaldon v. State, 266 P.3d 349.
- McCarthy Integrated System, LLC v. Evoqua Water Technologies, LLC 379 P.3d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- McCarthy Integrated System, LLC v. Evoqua Water Technologies, LLC 379 P.3d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Newman v. Select Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Newman v. Select Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- tempe/chavez v. state/brnovich 351 P.3d 367 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
tempe/chavez v. state/brnovich
351 P.3d 367
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 14 (2011) (noting “the term ‘corporation’ may embrace both private and public entities”); -16 (1924) (holding the term “corporation” under Employers’ Liability Law applies to municipal corporations).
- General Motors Corp. v. Maricopa County 350 P.3d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
General Motors Corp. v. Maricopa County
350 P.3d 841
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 13 , (“[A] statutory term is interpreted in context of the accompanying words.”).
- Metzler v. Bci Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, Inc. 329 P.3d 1043 Ariz. 2014
-
Metzler v. Bci Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, Inc.
329 P.3d 1043
Ariz. 2014
¶ 13, (internal quotation marks omitted).
- Wyatt Ex Rel. Estate of Wyatt v. Vanguard Health Systems, Inc. 329 P.3d 1040 Ariz. 2014
- Wyatt Ex Rel. Estate of Wyatt v. Vanguard Health Systems, Inc. 329 P.3d 1040 Ariz. 2014
- State of Arizona v. Travis Hamilton Nereim 317 P.3d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
-
State of Arizona v. Travis Hamilton Nereim
317 P.3d 646
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
7 STATE v. NEREIM Opinion of the Court (“[B]ecause ‘context gives meaning,’ statutory terms should not be considered in isolation.”)
- The ESTATE OF JOSEFA U. DeCAMACHO v. LA SOLANA CARE AND REHAB, INC. 316 P.3d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- The ESTATE OF JOSEFA U. DeCAMACHO v. LA SOLANA CARE AND REHAB, INC. 316 P.3d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- State of Arizona v. Armando Pena, Jr. 309 P.3d 936 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
-
State of Arizona v. Armando Pena, Jr.
309 P.3d 936
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
(principle of “noscitur a sociis .
- James C. Sell v. Hon. gama/squire & Company 295 P.3d 421 Ariz. 2013
-
James C. Sell v. Hon. gama/squire & Company
295 P.3d 421
Ariz. 2013
¶ 8, (internal quotation marks omitted).
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. White 295 P.3d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. White 295 P.3d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
- State of Arizona v. Marcus Deshaun Tucker, Clifton James Cuttler II and Andre Lavelle Armstrong 290 P.3d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
- State of Arizona v. Marcus Deshaun Tucker, Clifton James Cuttler II and Andre Lavelle Armstrong 290 P.3d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
- Cornerstone Hospital of Southeast Arizona v. Ernest H. Blackburn 290 P.3d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
- Cornerstone Hospital of Southeast Arizona v. Ernest H. Blackburn 290 P.3d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
- Glover v. Glover 289 P.3d 12 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
- Glover v. Glover 289 P.3d 12 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012