DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ralph and Carolee Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, 302 P.3d 617.

40 citing documents.

  • Mahanti v. Fraser Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Mahanti v. Fraser Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    See Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, LLC, ¶ 16 (2013).
  • Challenge v. Wholesale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Challenge v. Wholesale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    In a breach of contract action, a plaintiff must establish “the existence of the contract, its breach and the resulting damages.” Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, LLC, ¶ 16 (2013) (quotation omitted).
  • Chandler v. Roosevelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Chandler v. Roosevelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, LLC, ¶ 9 (2013).
  • Mason v. La Glorieta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Mason v. La Glorieta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    ¶15 To succeed on a breach of contract action, the plaintiff must prove three elements: “the existence of the contract, its breach and the resulting damages.” Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, LLC, ¶ 16 (2013) ().
  • Callaway v. North Ironwood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Callaway v. North Ironwood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    See Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, LLC, ¶ 12 (2013); see also Ariz. Prop.
  • Bordner v. Bates Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Bordner v. Bates Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, LLC, ¶ 16 (2013).
  • Le Canard v. Thorpe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Le Canard v. Thorpe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Anticipatory repudiation “giv[es] rise to a claim for damages and also excus[es] the necessity for the non-breaching party to tender performance.” Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, LLC, ¶ 9 (2013) (citations omitted).
  • Travelers v. Bollschweiler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Travelers v. Bollschweiler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    ¶13 Travelers’s breach of the contract claim requires it to prove “the existence of the contract, its breach[,] and the resulting damages.” See Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, LLC, ¶ 16 (2013) (quotation omitted).
  • Plea v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Plea v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, LLC, ¶ 16 (2013).
  • Aubuchon v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Aubuchon v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    ¶6 A breach of contract claim requires the plaintiff to show “the existence of the contract, its breach, and the resulting damages.” See Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, LLC, ¶ 16 (2013) (quotation omitted).
  • E&M Services v. A&N Services Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • E&M Services v. A&N Services Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, LLC, ¶ 16 (2013).
  • Salucci v. Arz Partners Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Salucci v. Arz Partners Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, LLC, ¶ 16 (2013).
  • Foss v. Abor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Foss v. Abor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    ¶24 A breach of contract claim requires “the existence of the contract, its breach and the resulting damages.” Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, LLC, ¶ 16 (2013).
  • Imh v. Recorp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Imh v. Recorp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Cf. Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, LLC, ¶ 16 (2013) (elements of breach of contract claim are (1) existence of the contract; (2) breach; and (3) resulting damages).
  • Spencer v. Asher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Spencer v. Asher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, LLC, ¶ 9 (citations omitted) (explaining that an anticipatory repudiation excuses the non-breaching party from tendering performance).
  • North v. Vps Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • North v. Vps Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    A. Dickens’ Authority: Trespass and Breach of Contract ¶12 Appellants first argue a genuine issue of material fact exists as to Dickens’ authority to either: (1) bind North Star to a contract with VPS which would give rise to the breach of contract counterclaims, see Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, L.L.C., ¶ 16 (2013) (“To bring an action for the breach of the contract, the [injured party] has the burden of proving the existence of the contract, its breach and the resulting damages.”) (emphasis 5 N
  • Thomas v. Montelucia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Thomas v. Montelucia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    See Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, LLC, ¶ 1 (App. 2012) (“Thomas I”); Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, LLC, ¶ 17 (2013) (“Thomas II”).
  • Shufeldt v. Nextcare Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Shufeldt v. Nextcare Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    ¶26 “‘To bring an action for the breach of the contract, the plaintiff has the burden of proving the existence of the contract, its [material] breach and the resulting damages.’” Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, LLC, ¶ 16 (2015) ().
  • Great Western Bank v. LJC Development, LLC 362 P.3d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Great Western Bank v. LJC Development, LLC 362 P.3d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    See Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, L.L.C., ¶ 9 (2013) (requiring the non-breaching party show “‘that he would have been ready and willing to have performed the contract, if the repudiation had not occurred’” in order to recover damages for anticipatory repudiation) (quoting United Cal.
  • Gammage v. Als Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Gammage v. Als Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    Thomas v. Montelucia Villas, LLC, ¶ 16