Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Hon. butler/tyler B., 302 P.3d 609.

73 citing documents.

Brown v. McClennen ex rel. County of Maricopa 373 P.3d 538 Ariz. 2016
State of Arizona v. Francisco L Encinas Valenzuela 371 P.3d 627 Ariz. 2016
Jason S Brown v. Hon. mcclennen/state Ariz. 2016
Jason S Brown v. Hon. mcclennen/state Ariz. 2016
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 219 (1973); ¶ 13
Brown v. McClennen ex rel. County of Maricopa 373 P.3d 538 Ariz. 2016
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); , 87 ¶ 13
State of Arizona v. Francisco L Encinas Valenzuela 371 P.3d 627 Ariz. 2016
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); , 87 ¶ 13
State v. Carrillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Carrillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
“If the arrestee is a juvenile, the youth’s age and a parent’s presence are relevant, though not necessarily determinative, factors that courts should consider in assessing whether consent was voluntary under the totality of the circumstances.” ¶ 18
State of Arizona v. Rosa Elene Becerra 366 P.3d 567 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Rosa Elene Becerra 366 P.3d 567 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Daniel Alberto Reyes 364 P.3d 1134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Daniel Alberto Reyes 364 P.3d 1134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State v. Okken 364 P.3d 485 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Okken 364 P.3d 485 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.’ ” ¶ 12 , (citation omitted).
State v. Nissley 362 P.3d 493 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Bustos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Bustos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State of Arizona v. Francisco L. Encinas Valenzuela 350 P.3d 811 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Francisco L. Encinas Valenzuela 350 P.3d 811 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State v. Spencer 333 P.3d 823 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Spencer 333 P.3d 823 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
This burden includes demonstrating that Spencer’s consent was “freely and voluntarily given.” See, ¶ 19, (discussing consent to search); ¶ 9, (State’s burden to prove voluntariness of statements).
State of Arizona v. Miguel Francisco Inzunza 316 P.3d 1266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Miguel Francisco Inzunza 316 P.3d 1266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by