Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Fleming v. State Department of Public Safety, 352 P.3d 446.

29 citing documents.

Phoenician Equity v. Dreambrands Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Phoenician Equity v. Dreambrands Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State of Arizona v. Asalia Guadalupe Alvarez-Soto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State of Arizona v. Asalia Guadalupe Alvarez-Soto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
Safety, (courts must construe separate statutory provisions related to same subject matter together “as though they constitute one law”).
Planned Parenthood v. Kristin mayes/hazelrigg Ariz. 2024
Planned Parenthood v. Kristin mayes/hazelrigg Ariz. 2024
Safety, ¶ 12 (2015) (“[W]hen statutes relate to the same subject matter, we construe them together as though they constitute one law .
Antoinette Windhurst v. Adoc Ariz. 2023
Antoinette Windhurst v. Adoc Ariz. 2023
Safety, ¶ 12 (2015) (refusing to apply a meaning that “leads to impossible or absurd results”) (quoting Orca Commc’ns Unlimited, ¶ 9 (2014)).
Planned Parenthood Arizona, Inc. v. Mark Brnovich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
Planned Parenthood Arizona, Inc. v. Mark Brnovich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
Safety, (courts must construe separate statutory provisions relating to same subject matter “together as though they constitute one law”); UNUM Life Ins.
Marcie a Redgrave v. Doug Ducey 493 P.3d 878 Ariz. 2021
Marcie a Redgrave v. Doug Ducey 493 P.3d 878 Ariz. 2021
Safety, ¶¶ 18–19 (2015) (crediting legislative statement of purpose and intent for pro-liability presumption); Doe, 200 Ariz. at 175–76 ¶ 4 (same); Fidelity Sec.
Lane v. Core Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Lane v. Core Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
JH2K I LLC v. Ariz. Dep't of Health Servs. 438 P.3d 676 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
JH2K I LLC v. Ariz. Dep't of Health Servs. 438 P.3d 676 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Berndt v. Ariz. Dep't of Corrections , , 528 ¶ 11, (quoting Fleming v. Dep't of Public Safety , , 417 ¶ 12, ).
Compassionate Care Dispensary, Inc. v. Ariz. Dep't of Health Servs. 418 P.3d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Compassionate Care Dispensary, Inc. v. Ariz. Dep't of Health Servs. 418 P.3d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Safety , , 417, ¶ 12, , 449 (2015) ).
Brent Randall Phillips v. Hon. o'neil/state Bar Ariz. 2017
Brent Randall Phillips v. Hon. o'neil/state Bar Ariz. 2017
Safety, ¶ 12 (2015) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Ramsey v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors 384 P.3d 316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ramsey v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors 384 P.3d 316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
ades/taylor v. Pandola 382 P.3d 101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
David C., Kim C. v. Alexis S., A.C. 375 P.3d 945 Ariz. 2016
David C., Kim C. v. Alexis S., A.C. 375 P.3d 945 Ariz. 2016
¶9 When a statute is unambiguous, “we apply its terms without resorting to other tools of statutory interpretation, unless doing so leads to impossible or absurd results.” ¶ 12, (quoting Orca Commc'ns Unlimited, ¶ 9, ).
City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc. 375 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc. 375 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Berndt v. Ariz. Dep’t of Corrections, ¶ 11 (App. 2015) (quoting Fleming v. Dep’t of Public Safety, ¶ 12 (2015)).
Berndt v. Arizona Department of Corrections 363 P.3d 141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Berndt v. Arizona Department of Corrections 363 P.3d 141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Fleming v. Dep’t of Public Safety, ¶ 12 , (citing Bell v. Indus.