Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Demetrius L. v. Joshlynn F./d.L., 365 P.3d 353.

594 citing documents.

Shirley R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Shirley R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Mary Jean M. v. Dcs, E.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Mary Jean M. v. Dcs, E.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Seth M. v. Arienne M. 426 P.3d 1224 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Seth M. v. Arienne M. 426 P.3d 1224 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Megan M. v. Matthew M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Megan M. v. Matthew M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Johanna M. v. Dcs, Y.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Johanna M. v. Dcs, Y.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Francisco v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Francisco v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 15 (2016); Kent K., 210 Ariz. at 286, ¶ 35.
Demetric L. v. Dcs, A.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Demetric L. v. Dcs, A.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Alejandro E. v. Dcs, K.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Alejandro E. v. Dcs, K.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 15 (2016) (“Once a juvenile court finds that a parent is unfit, the focus shifts to the child’s interests.
Gloria M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Gloria M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“Of foremost concern in that regard is ‘protect[ing] a child’s interest in stability and security.’” ¶ 15 (2016) (citing Kent K., 210 Ariz. at 286, ¶ 34).
Alan C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Alan C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶¶ 12, 14 (2016) (“When a current placement meets the child’s needs and the child’s prospective adoption is otherwise legally possible and likely,” the superior court may find that severance is in the child’s best interests.).
Craig M. v. Dcs, S.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Gabriella L v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jessica C., Joel A. v. Dcs, J.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Craig M. v. Dcs, S.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 15 (2016) (noting that once a juvenile court finds a statutory ground for severance, “in considering best interests, the court must balance the unfit parent’s ‘diluted interest’ against the independent and often adverse interests of the child in a safe and stable home life”) (quotation omitted).
Gabriella L v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
we can presume that the interests of the parent and child diverge because the court has already found the existence of one of the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.” ¶ 15 (2016).
Jessica C., Joel A. v. Dcs, J.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sean M., Mary K. v. Dcs, M.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sean M., Mary K. v. Dcs, M.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Brittany P., Andres G. v. Dcs, N.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Brittany P., Andres G. v. Dcs, N.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 12 (2016); see Mary Lou C. v. Ariz. Dep't of Econ.
Monica v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Monica v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶13 “[I]n considering best interests, the court must balance the unfit parent’s ‘diluted’ interest ‘against the independent and often adverse interests of the child in a safe and stable home life.’” ¶ 15 (2016).
Tzsiah E. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Tzsiah E. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 15 (2016); Kent K., 210 Ariz. at 287, ¶ 38.
Angelina D. v. Dcs, D.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Angelina D. v. Dcs, D.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Titus S. v. Dep't of Child Safety 418 P.3d 1138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Titus S. v. Dep't of Child Safety 418 P.3d 1138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Demetrius L. v. Joshlynn F. , , ¶ 16
Danielle M. v. Dcs, T.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Danielle M. v. Dcs, T.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jered W. v. Dcs, M.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jered W. v. Dcs, M.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 20 (App. 2014) (holding termination is in the child’s best interest if the child will benefit from the termination or will be harmed if the relationship continues); -4, ¶ 12 (2016) (holding a court should consider whether the current placement is meeting the child’s needs, an adoption plan is in place, and if the child is adoptable when determining whether the child will benefit).
Salvatore D. v. Whitney D., S.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Salvatore D. v. Whitney D., S.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
wants her last name to be the same as her other family members and that “she very much so wants to be adopted.” ¶ 1 (2016) (“[I]n a private proceeding to sever parental rights, just as in state-initiated proceedings, a juvenile court may conclude that a proposed adoption benefits the child and supports a finding that severance is in the child’s best interests.”).
Tomi M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Ellesse J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Tomi M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Ellesse J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 9 (2016) (citation omitted).
Alma S. v. Dep't of Child Safety 418 P.3d 925 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Shontal K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017