Cited by

See, e.g., Dobson Bay Club II DD, LLC v. La Sonrisa de Siena, LLC, (voiding contractual late fee term as an unenforceable penalty because contract remedies should be compensatory, not punitive); CSA 13-101 Loop, LLC v. Loop 101, LLC, (holding parties could not prospectively waive statutory rights protecting public interests, including the right to have the

See Dobson Bay Club II DD, LLC v. La Sonrisa de Siena, LLC, ¶ 41 (2017).

See Dobson Bay Club II DD, LLC v. La Sonrisa de Siena, LLC, ¶ 15, 112 ¶ 18 (2017) (Restatement application); Banner Univ.

Dobson Bay Club II DD, LLC v. La Sonrisa de Siena, LLC, ¶ 9 (2017).

See, e.g., Dobson Bay Club II DD, LLC v. La Sonrisa de Siena, LLC, ¶¶ 37–38 (2017) (voiding a contractual late fee as an unenforceable penalty provision); CSA 13-101 Loop, 236 Ariz. at 411 ¶ 1 (holding that parties to a promissory note and deed of trust could not prospectively waive a judgment debtor’s statutory right to have the fair market value of the burdened property credit

¶8 Root Bar argues that increased fixed minimum rent, the interest charges, and the 10% service charges are unenforceable penalties because, by percentage, those charges are greater than a 5% late fee held unenforceable in Dobson Bay Club II DD, LLC v. La Sonrisa de Siena, LLC. –10, 115, ¶¶ 2–5, 37 (2017) (holding $1.4 million late fee was unenforceable penalty for untimely balloon payment in commercial loan).

See Dobson Bay Club II DD, LLC v. La Sonrisa de Siena, LLC, ¶ 39 (2017).

Dobson Bay Club II DD, LLC v. La Sonrisa de Siena, LLC, –16 ¶ 39 (2017).

See State of the Netherlands, 248 Ariz. at 539–40 ¶ 19 (citing examples); see also Dobson Bay Club II DD, LLC v. La Sonrisa de Siena, LLC, ¶ 15 (2017) (“We adopt the Restatement Second § 356(1) to test the enforceability of a stipulated damages provision.” (emphasis added)); Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 2 5 THE STATE OF THE NETHERLANDS V. MD HELICOPTERS, INC. Opinion of the Court (“The supr

But “[t]he contract clause only limits the state’s ability to impair existing contract obligations; it does not curtail application of proscriptive principles that existed at the time of contract creation.” Dobson Bay Club II DD, LLC v. La Sonrisa de Siena, LLC, ¶ 41 (2017).

Dobson Bay Club II DD, LLC v. La Sonrisa de Siena, LLC, ¶ 18 (2017).

Dobson Bay Club II DD, LLC v. La Sonrisa de Siena, LLC, ¶ 8 (2017).

Dobson Bay Club II DD, LLC v. La Sonrisa de Siena, LLC, –13, ¶ 21 (2017); Pima Sav.