Cited by

¶ 30 (2023) (“[W]e interpret statutory language in view of the entire text, considering the context and related statutes on the same subject.” ( ¶ 34 (2020)); Burns v. Ariz. Pub.

¶ 9 (2020), to conclude the measure complied with A.R.S.

¶¶ 8, 10 (2020) (“Molera II”).

We therefore “‘interpret statutory language in view of the entire text, considering the context and related statutes on the same subject,’ giving the words ‘their ordinary meaning unless it appears from the context or otherwise that a different meaning is intended.’” Windhurst v. Ariz. Dep’t of Corr., (citations omitted) ( and then Ariz. ex rel.

Windhurst, __ Ariz. __, ¶ 13, 536 P.3d at 769 ().

(); (“As this case involves the intersection of multiple statutes, we construe them together, seeking to give meaning to all provisions.” ()).

5 ANTOINETTE WINDHURST V. ADOC, ET AL. Opinion of the Court subject,” ¶ 34 (2020) (cleaned up) (quoting Ariz. Chapter of the Associated Gen.

v. MD Helicopters, Inc., ¶ 8 (2020) (“[W]e interpret statutory language in view of the entire text, considering the context and related statutes on the same subject.”) ( ¶ 34 (2020)).

¶ 13 (Ariz. 2023) (“[W]e ‘interpret statutory language in view of the entire text, considering the context and related statutes on the same subject’” ( ¶ 34 (2020)).

n fact, ‘change existing law regarding secured debt’ by preventing some secured creditors from collecting against certain debtor assets that are subject to levy under current law.” ¶4 In evaluating whether the description was objectively false or misleading, the trial court first considered what the term “secured debt” is “commonly understood to mean,” citing Molera v. Hobbs (Molera II), ¶ 21 (2020).

As mentioned above, when the language of a statute is not clear and unambiguous, “we apply secondary interpretive principles, such as considering ‘the statute’s subject matter, historical background, effect and consequences, and spirit and purpose.’” ¶ 34 (2020) (quoting Rosas v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.

To do so, “we interpret statutory language in view of the entire text, considering the context and related statutes on the same subject.” ¶ 34 (2020) (citation omitted) (internal alterations omitted).