Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Renner v. Kehl, 722 P.2d 262.

38 citing documents.

Tempe Woman's v. Loren Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Tempe Woman's v. Loren Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
h; (proper restitution for rescission of a property transaction includes “reimbursement for the fair market value of the use of the property.”).
Soldwedel v. Soldwedel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Soldwedel v. Soldwedel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Plan, -42, ¶ 25 (2016); Restatement (Second) of Contracts (“Restatement”) § 152(1) (1981) (providing for voidability of a contract where the parties made a mutual mistake as to a basic contractual assumption at the time of contract formation); -97 (1986) (applying § 152 to address the defense of mutual mistake of fact).
Blaser v. Kaiser Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Blaser v. Kaiser Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Accordingly, we must presume the transcript would support the court’s exercise of discretion, n.1 (1986) ( -43 (1982)), and find no error.
Phillips v. Cabrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Phillips v. Cabrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
n.1 (1986) (-43 (1982), ).
Harvey v. Hon. kalauli/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Harvey v. Hon. kalauli/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
–61 (1978) (“[W]hen an incomplete record is presented to an appellate court, it must assume that any testimony or evidence not included in the record on appeal supported the action taken by the trial court.”); n.1 (1986) (“Without a record we must presume that .
Turley v. Beus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Knight v. Knight Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Knight v. Knight Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
n.1 (1986) (-43 (1982), ).
Turley v. Beus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“A mutual mistake exists where there has been a meeting of the minds of the parties and an agreement is actually entered into, but the agreement contains a mistake regarding an essential part of the contract.” Hartford, 178 Ariz. at 111 ( and Hill-Shafer, 165 Ariz. at 473); see also Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 152 cmt.
Hall v. Elected Officials' Retirement Plan 383 P.3d 1107 Ariz. 2016
Hall v. Elected Officials' Retirement Plan 383 P.3d 1107 Ariz. 2016
Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 152(1) (1981); , (applying § 152 in resolving claim of mutual mistake of fact).
Jones v. Bell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jones v. Bell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.1 3 Absent material changes from the relevant date, we cite a statute’s current version.
Phoenix v. Cortes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Phoenix v. Cortes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
n.1, n.1 (1986) (“Without a record we must presume that the trial court properly exercised its discretion and that there was substantial evidence in the complete record to support the findings of the trial court.”) (-43, We note that ef
Atkinson v. McIndoo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Atkinson v. McIndoo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
n.1, ATKINSON v. MCINDOO Decision of the Court ¶28 Because both Child’s home state and the issuing state declined jurisdiction, the Arizona court was entitled under A.R.S.
Estate of Nelson v. Rice 12 P.3d 238 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Estate of Nelson v. Rice 12 P.3d 238 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
A contract may be rescinded on the ground of a mutual mistake as to a “ ‘basic assumption on which both parties made the contract.’ ” , quoting Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 152 cmt.
Bolm v. Custodian of Records of Tucson Police Department 969 P.2d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Bolm v. Custodian of Records of Tucson Police Department 969 P.2d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Emmons v. Superior Court 968 P.2d 582 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Emmons v. Superior Court 968 P.2d 582 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Hartford v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 870 P.2d 1202 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Hartford v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 870 P.2d 1202 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
McAlister v. Citibank 829 P.2d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
McAlister v. Citibank 829 P.2d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
-98 , -266 (1986); see also Drop Anchor Realty v. Hartford Fire Ins.
Plattner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 812 P.2d 1129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Plattner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 812 P.2d 1129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
See, , 97 n. 1, , 265 n. 1 (1986).
State v. Williams 819 P.2d 962 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Williams 819 P.2d 962 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Hardin v. Hardin 788 P.2d 1252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Hardin v. Hardin 788 P.2d 1252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by