Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Filasky v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance, 734 P.2d 76.

36 citing documents.

Swift Transportation Co of Az v. Hon. Carman Ariz. 2022
Swift Transportation Co of Az v. Hon. Carman Ariz. 2022
Tarter v. Bendt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Tarter v. Bendt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Co., ("All we require of the trial judge is that he convey in his instructions to the jury the substance of the applicable legal standard.").
Security Title Agency, Inc. v. Pope 200 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Security Title Agency, Inc. v. Pope 200 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Parking Concepts, Inc. v. Tenney 83 P.3d 19 Ariz. 2004
Parking Concepts, Inc. v. Tenney 83 P.3d 19 Ariz. 2004
Co., -98 , -83 (1987) (holding that pain, humiliation, inconvenience, pecuniary losses, and punitive damages may be recovered in a bad faith action); Farr v. Transamerica Occidental Life Ins.
Beaudry v. Insurance Co. of the West 50 P.3d 836 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Beaudry v. Insurance Co. of the West 50 P.3d 836 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Co., , (plaintiff “must also show that the evil hand that unjustifiably damaged the objectives sought to be reached by the insurance contract was guided by an evil mind which either consciously sought to damage the insured or acted intentionally, knowing that its conduct was likely to cause unju
Voland v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 943 P.2d 808 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Voland v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 943 P.2d 808 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Co., , plaintiffs counsel requested the carriers to send “drafts totalling the amount of $30,000.00,” stated “[w]e can arbitrate the difference,” and concluded: “Although I believe that your evaluation of this claim at $30,000.00 is without foundation and itself is evidence of bad faith, it is clear tha
Rhue v. Dawson 841 P.2d 215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Rhue v. Dawson 841 P.2d 215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Walter v. Simmons 818 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Walter v. Simmons 818 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Co., , (delay in paying benefits under contract supports bad faith claim); , (insurer’s payment of entire amount of claim does not necessarily defeat bad faith claim).
Deese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 813 P.2d 318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Deese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 813 P.2d 318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
See, e.g., Dodge v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, , (imposing liability upon a surety “who in bad faith refuses to pay a valid claim” will deter improper conduct); , (insurer’s intentional failure to pay a claim without a reasonable basis for such action constitutes a breach of the implied duty of good faith); , (tort of bad faith arises “when an insurance company intentionally denie
Schwartz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 800 P.2d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Schwartz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 800 P.2d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Farr v. Transamerica Occidental Life Ins.
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Stevens 802 P.2d 1071 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Stevens 802 P.2d 1071 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
490 , 74 L.Ed.2d 632 (1982)
Olson v. Walker 781 P.2d 1015 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Olson v. Walker 781 P.2d 1015 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
White v. Mitchell 759 P.2d 1327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
White v. Mitchell 759 P.2d 1327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
(approved in Rawlings v. Apodaca, 151 Ariz. at 161, 163 , 726 P.2d at 577, 579 ).
Ranburger v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 760 P.2d 551 Ariz. 1988
Ranburger v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 760 P.2d 551 Ariz. 1988
Co., , 599 n. 3, , 84 n. 3 (1987).
Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 758 P.2d 1313 Ariz. 1988
Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 758 P.2d 1313 Ariz. 1988
Gurule v. Illinois Mutual Life & Casualty Co., , , , , cert.
Bates v. Superior Court, Maricopa County 749 P.2d 1367 Ariz. 1988
Bates v. Superior Court, Maricopa County 749 P.2d 1367 Ariz. 1988
See, , (in insurance bad faith case, jury awarded plaintiff $100,000 in damages for emotional distress).
Lasma Corp. v. Monarch Insurance 764 P.2d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Lasma Corp. v. Monarch Insurance 764 P.2d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Gurule v. Illinois Mutual Life & Casualty Co. 734 P.2d 85 Ariz. 1987
Gurule v. Illinois Mutual Life & Casualty Co. 734 P.2d 85 Ariz. 1987
which shows reckless indifference to the results of an act or reckless indifference to the rights and welfare of others.” The standard articulated in Rawlings requires more than “reckless indifference.” , 599 n. 3, , 84 n. 3 (1987); Linthicum, 150 Ariz. at 331 , 723 P.2d at 680 .