Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Kadish v. Arizona State Land Department, 747 P.2d 1183.
-
Sleeseman v. State Board of Education
753 P.2d 186
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
“Arizona law is cognizant of the substantial benefit doctrine, but has neither adopted nor rejected it.” In any event, since we have affirmed summary judgment for Sleeseman on the ground that she comes within the statute and since we do not address the constitutionality of the statut