Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Helme, 735 P.2d 451.

89 citing documents.

American Commerce Insurance Brokers, Inc. v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. 535 N.W.2d 365 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Northern Ins. Co. of New York v. Morgan 918 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Northern Ins. Co. of New York v. Morgan 918 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
(holding that insureds did not breach their duty of cooperation merely by entering a Damron agreement).
Nichols v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 857 P.2d 406 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Nichols v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 857 P.2d 406 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
“the rule in Arizona is that we construe a clause subject to different interpretations by examining the language of the clause, public policy considerations, and the purpose of
Pruett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 857 P.2d 1301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Pruett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 857 P.2d 1301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Betancourt v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Fund 823 P.2d 1304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Betancourt v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Fund 823 P.2d 1304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Arizona Property & , Arizona Property &amp
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Peaton 812 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Peaton 812 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
The trial court, in granting summary judgment, erroneously relied on Arizona Property & , for the proposition that “[a]s a matter of law, the making of a Damron agreement, without more, is not a breach of a cooperation clause.” Although the Helme court found that Damron agreements are not “inherently collusive or fraudulent,” id.
Mutual Insurance v. Bodnar 793 P.2d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Mutual Insurance v. Bodnar 793 P.2d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 792 P.2d 749 Ariz. 1990
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 792 P.2d 749 Ariz. 1990
City of Glendale v. Farmers Ins.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wilson 782 P.2d 727 Ariz. 1989
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wilson 782 P.2d 727 Ariz. 1989
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 448 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1989
St. Michel v. Burns and Wilcox, Ltd. 433 N.W.2d 130 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Johnson v. SUPERIOR COURT, PIMA COUNTY 763 P.2d 1382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 428 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Holt v. Utica Mutual Insurance 759 P.2d 623 Ariz. 1988
Holt v. Utica Mutual Insurance 759 P.2d 623 Ariz. 1988
See, e.g., Arizona Property & -37 , -59 (1987)
Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Herder 751 P.2d 519 Ariz. 1988
Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Herder 751 P.2d 519 Ariz. 1988
Campbell v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 745 P.2d 160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Campbell v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 745 P.2d 160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Knipp v. Ariz. Prop. & Cas. Ins. 750 P.2d 895 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Knipp v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 750 P.2d 895 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Knipp v. Ariz. Prop. & Cas. Ins. 750 P.2d 895 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Knipp v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 750 P.2d 895 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Morris 741 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1987
United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Morris 741 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1987
See Arizona Property *117 &amp
Holt v. Utica Mutual Insurance 759 P.2d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Holt v. Utica Mutual Insurance 759 P.2d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Westfield Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. 739 P.2d 218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Westfield Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. 739 P.2d 218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
The Arizona Supreme Court has recently held: “We prefer, instead, to determine the meaning of a clause which is subject to different interpretations or constructions by examining the purpose of the clause, public policy considerations, and the transaction as a whole.” The Arizona Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Helme
Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Oliver 741 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Oliver 741 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987