Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Tilson v. Mofford, 737 P.2d 1367.
- Pioneer Trust Co. v. Pima County 811 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
- Slayton v. Shumway 800 P.2d 590 Ariz. 1990
-
Slayton v. Shumway
800 P.2d 590
Ariz. 1990
*90 Our previous cases have adopted a single subject rule that prevents the “pernicious practice of ‘log-rolling’ ” whereby dissimilar provisions are combined in a single proposition “so that voters must vote for or against the whole package even though they would have voted differently had the propositions been submitted separately.” , ( , ).
- Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Round Valley Unified School District No. 10 789 P.2d 399 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
- Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Round Valley Unified School District No. 10 789 P.2d 399 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
- Green v. Osborne 758 P.2d 138 Ariz. 1988
- Green v. Osborne 758 P.2d 138 Ariz. 1988